提交 73f20e58 编写于 作者: A Andrew Morton 提交者: Linus Torvalds

FAT_VALID_MEDIA(): remove pointless test

The on-disk media specification field in FAT is only 8-bits, so testing for
<=0xff is pointless, and can generate a "comparison is always true due to
limited range of data type" warning.

While we're there, convert FAT_VALID_MEDIA() into a C function - the present
implementation is buggy: it generates either one or two references to its
argument.

Cc: Frank Seidel <fseidel@suse.de>
Acked-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 c7a6c4ed
......@@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ int fat_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent,
*/
media = b->media;
if (!FAT_VALID_MEDIA(media)) {
if (!fat_valid_media(media)) {
if (!silent)
printk(KERN_ERR "FAT: invalid media value (0x%02x)\n",
media);
......
......@@ -58,7 +58,11 @@
#define MSDOS_DOTDOT ".. " /* "..", padded to MSDOS_NAME chars */
/* media of boot sector */
#define FAT_VALID_MEDIA(x) ((0xF8 <= (x) && (x) <= 0xFF) || (x) == 0xF0)
static inline int fat_valid_media(u8 media)
{
return 0xf8 <= media || media == 0xf0;
}
#define FAT_FIRST_ENT(s, x) ((MSDOS_SB(s)->fat_bits == 32 ? 0x0FFFFF00 : \
MSDOS_SB(s)->fat_bits == 16 ? 0xFF00 : 0xF00) | (x))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册