提交 73a1441a 编写于 作者: A Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交者: Michael Ellerman

powerpc/mm/subpage: Clear RWX bit to indicate no access

Subpage protection used to depend on the _PAGE_USER bit to implement no
access mode. This patch switches that to use _PAGE_RWX. We clear Read,
Write and Execute access from the pte instead of clearing _PAGE_USER
now. This was done so that we can switch to _PAGE_PRIVILEGED in a later
patch.

subpage_protection() returns pte bits that need to be cleared. Instead
of updating the interface to handle no-access in a separate way, it
appears simpler to clear RWX acecss to indicate no access.

We still don't insert hash ptes for no access implied by !_PAGE_RWX.
Hence we should not get PROT_FAULT with change.
Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
上级 c7d54842
......@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ void demote_segment_4k(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
* Userspace sets the subpage permissions using the subpage_prot system call.
*
* Result is 0: full permissions, _PAGE_RW: read-only,
* _PAGE_USER or _PAGE_USER|_PAGE_RW: no access.
* _PAGE_RWX: no access.
*/
static int subpage_protection(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long ea)
{
......@@ -947,8 +947,13 @@ static int subpage_protection(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long ea)
/* extract 2-bit bitfield for this 4k subpage */
spp >>= 30 - 2 * ((ea >> 12) & 0xf);
/* turn 0,1,2,3 into combination of _PAGE_USER and _PAGE_RW */
spp = ((spp & 2) ? _PAGE_USER : 0) | ((spp & 1) ? _PAGE_RW : 0);
/*
* 0 -> full premission
* 1 -> Read only
* 2 -> no access.
* We return the flag that need to be cleared.
*/
spp = ((spp & 2) ? _PAGE_RWX : 0) | ((spp & 1) ? _PAGE_WRITE : 0);
return spp;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册