提交 6de43703 编写于 作者: A Arnd Bergmann 提交者: Jens Axboe

block: remove BKL from BLKROSET and BLKFLSBUF

We only call the functions set_device_ro(),
invalidate_bdev(), sync_filesystem() and sync_blockdev()
while holding the BKL in these commands. All
of these are also done in other code paths without
the BKL, which leads me to the conclusion that
the BKL is not needed here either.

The reason we hold it here is that it was originally
pushed down into the ioctl function from vfs_ioctl.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
上级 62c2a7d9
......@@ -197,10 +197,8 @@ int blkdev_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, unsigned cmd,
if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != -ENOTTY)
return ret;
lock_kernel();
fsync_bdev(bdev);
invalidate_bdev(bdev);
unlock_kernel();
return 0;
case BLKROSET:
......@@ -212,9 +210,7 @@ int blkdev_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, unsigned cmd,
return -EACCES;
if (get_user(n, (int __user *)(arg)))
return -EFAULT;
lock_kernel();
set_device_ro(bdev, n);
unlock_kernel();
return 0;
case BLKDISCARD: {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册