提交 6a79e391 编写于 作者: A Adrian Hunter 提交者: Pierre Ossman

mmc_block: ensure all sectors that do not have errors are read

If a card encounters an ECC error while reading a sector it will
timeout.  Instead of reporting the entire I/O request as having
an error, redo the I/O one sector at a time so that all readable
sectors are provided to the upper layers.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NPierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
上级 a0d045ca
......@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data;
struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card;
struct mmc_blk_request brq;
int ret = 1;
int ret = 1, disable_multi = 0;
mmc_claim_host(card->host);
......@@ -251,6 +251,14 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
brq.stop.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
brq.data.blocks = req->nr_sectors;
/*
* After a read error, we redo the request one sector at a time
* in order to accurately determine which sectors can be read
* successfully.
*/
if (disable_multi && brq.data.blocks > 1)
brq.data.blocks = 1;
if (brq.data.blocks > 1) {
/* SPI multiblock writes terminate using a special
* token, not a STOP_TRANSMISSION request.
......@@ -279,6 +287,25 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
brq.data.sg = mq->sg;
brq.data.sg_len = mmc_queue_map_sg(mq);
/*
* Adjust the sg list so it is the same size as the
* request.
*/
if (brq.data.blocks != req->nr_sectors) {
int i, data_size = brq.data.blocks << 9;
struct scatterlist *sg;
for_each_sg(brq.data.sg, sg, brq.data.sg_len, i) {
data_size -= sg->length;
if (data_size <= 0) {
sg->length += data_size;
i++;
break;
}
}
brq.data.sg_len = i;
}
mmc_queue_bounce_pre(mq);
mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &brq.mrq);
......@@ -290,8 +317,16 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
* until later as we need to wait for the card to leave
* programming mode even when things go wrong.
*/
if (brq.cmd.error || brq.data.error || brq.stop.error)
if (brq.cmd.error || brq.data.error || brq.stop.error) {
if (brq.data.blocks > 1 && rq_data_dir(req) == READ) {
/* Redo read one sector at a time */
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: retrying using single "
"block read\n", req->rq_disk->disk_name);
disable_multi = 1;
continue;
}
status = get_card_status(card, req);
}
if (brq.cmd.error) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: error %d sending read/write "
......@@ -348,8 +383,20 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
#endif
}
if (brq.cmd.error || brq.data.error || brq.stop.error)
if (brq.cmd.error || brq.stop.error || brq.data.error) {
if (rq_data_dir(req) == READ) {
/*
* After an error, we redo I/O one sector at a
* time, so we only reach here after trying to
* read a single sector.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
ret = __blk_end_request(req, -EIO, brq.data.blksz);
spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
continue;
}
goto cmd_err;
}
/*
* A block was successfully transferred.
......@@ -371,25 +418,20 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
* If the card is not SD, we can still ok written sectors
* as reported by the controller (which might be less than
* the real number of written sectors, but never more).
*
* For reads we just fail the entire chunk as that should
* be safe in all cases.
*/
if (rq_data_dir(req) != READ) {
if (mmc_card_sd(card)) {
u32 blocks;
if (mmc_card_sd(card)) {
u32 blocks;
blocks = mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks(card);
if (blocks != (u32)-1) {
spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
ret = __blk_end_request(req, 0, blocks << 9);
spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
}
} else {
blocks = mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks(card);
if (blocks != (u32)-1) {
spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
ret = __blk_end_request(req, 0, brq.data.bytes_xfered);
ret = __blk_end_request(req, 0, blocks << 9);
spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
}
} else {
spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
ret = __blk_end_request(req, 0, brq.data.bytes_xfered);
spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
}
mmc_release_host(card->host);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册