提交 680a647b 编写于 作者: C Christoph Hellwig

xfs: PF_FSTRANS should never be set in ->writepage

Now that we reject direct reclaim in addition to always using GFP_NOFS
allocation there's no chance we'll ever end up in ->writepage with
PF_FSTRANS set.  Add a WARN_ON if we hit this case, and stop checking
if we'd actually need to start a transaction.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
上级 1316d4da
......@@ -894,11 +894,6 @@ xfs_aops_discard_page(
* For unwritten space on the page we need to start the conversion to
* regular allocated space.
* For any other dirty buffer heads on the page we should flush them.
*
* If we detect that a transaction would be required to flush the page, we
* have to check the process flags first, if we are already in a transaction
* or disk I/O during allocations is off, we need to fail the writepage and
* redirty the page.
*/
STATIC int
xfs_vm_writepage(
......@@ -906,7 +901,6 @@ xfs_vm_writepage(
struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
int delalloc, unwritten;
struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
struct xfs_bmbt_irec imap;
xfs_ioend_t *ioend = NULL, *iohead = NULL;
......@@ -938,15 +932,10 @@ xfs_vm_writepage(
goto redirty;
/*
* We need a transaction if there are delalloc or unwritten buffers
* on the page.
*
* If we need a transaction and the process flags say we are already
* in a transaction, or no IO is allowed then mark the page dirty
* again and leave the page as is.
* Given that we do not allow direct reclaim to call us, we should
* never be called while in a filesystem transaction.
*/
xfs_count_page_state(page, &delalloc, &unwritten);
if ((current->flags & PF_FSTRANS) && (delalloc || unwritten))
if (WARN_ON(current->flags & PF_FSTRANS))
goto redirty;
/* Is this page beyond the end of the file? */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册