提交 6705e127 编写于 作者: W William Breathitt Gray 提交者: Jonathan Cameron

iio: stx104: Remove unneeded struct stx104_dev code

The stx104_dev structure was used to hold private data for use in the
stx104_remove function. Now that the stx104_remove function is gone, the
stx104_dev structure and relevant code is no longer needed. This patch
removes the unnecessary code.
Signed-off-by: NWilliam Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
上级 2763ea05
......@@ -76,16 +76,6 @@ struct stx104_gpio {
unsigned int out_state;
};
/**
* struct stx104_dev - STX104 device private data structure
* @indio_dev: IIO device
* @chip: instance of the gpio_chip
*/
struct stx104_dev {
struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
struct gpio_chip *chip;
};
static int stx104_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val, int *val2, long mask)
{
......@@ -271,7 +261,6 @@ static int stx104_probe(struct device *dev, unsigned int id)
struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
struct stx104_iio *priv;
struct stx104_gpio *stx104gpio;
struct stx104_dev *stx104dev;
int err;
indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*priv));
......@@ -282,10 +271,6 @@ static int stx104_probe(struct device *dev, unsigned int id)
if (!stx104gpio)
return -ENOMEM;
stx104dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stx104dev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!stx104dev)
return -ENOMEM;
if (!devm_request_region(dev, base[id], STX104_EXTENT,
dev_name(dev))) {
dev_err(dev, "Unable to lock port addresses (0x%X-0x%X)\n",
......@@ -335,10 +320,6 @@ static int stx104_probe(struct device *dev, unsigned int id)
spin_lock_init(&stx104gpio->lock);
stx104dev->indio_dev = indio_dev;
stx104dev->chip = &stx104gpio->chip;
dev_set_drvdata(dev, stx104dev);
err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &stx104gpio->chip, stx104gpio);
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "GPIO registering failed (%d)\n", err);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册