IB/uverbs: Lock SRQ / CQ / PD objects in a consistent order
Since XRC support was added, the uverbs code has locked SRQ, CQ and PD objects needed during QP and SRQ creation in different orders depending on the the code path. This leads to the (at least theoretical) possibility of deadlock, and triggers the lockdep splat below. Fix this by making sure we always lock the SRQ first, then CQs and finally the PD. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.4.0-rc5+ #34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- ibv_srq_pingpon/2484 is trying to acquire lock: (SRQ-uobj){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffffa00af51b>] idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] but task is already holding lock: (CQ-uobj){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffffa00af51b>] idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (CQ-uobj){+++++.}: [<ffffffff81070fd0>] lock_acquire+0xbf/0xfe [<ffffffff81384f28>] down_read+0x34/0x43 [<ffffffffa00af51b>] idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00af542>] idr_read_obj+0x9/0x19 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00b16c3>] ib_uverbs_create_qp+0x180/0x684 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00ae3dd>] ib_uverbs_write+0xb7/0xc2 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffff810fe47f>] vfs_write+0xa7/0xee [<ffffffff810fe65f>] sys_write+0x45/0x69 [<ffffffff8138cdf9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b -> #1 (PD-uobj){++++++}: [<ffffffff81070fd0>] lock_acquire+0xbf/0xfe [<ffffffff81384f28>] down_read+0x34/0x43 [<ffffffffa00af51b>] idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00af542>] idr_read_obj+0x9/0x19 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00af8ad>] __uverbs_create_xsrq+0x96/0x386 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00b31b9>] ib_uverbs_detach_mcast+0x1cd/0x1e6 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00ae3dd>] ib_uverbs_write+0xb7/0xc2 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffff810fe47f>] vfs_write+0xa7/0xee [<ffffffff810fe65f>] sys_write+0x45/0x69 [<ffffffff8138cdf9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b -> #0 (SRQ-uobj){+++++.}: [<ffffffff81070898>] __lock_acquire+0xa29/0xd06 [<ffffffff81070fd0>] lock_acquire+0xbf/0xfe [<ffffffff81384f28>] down_read+0x34/0x43 [<ffffffffa00af51b>] idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00af542>] idr_read_obj+0x9/0x19 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00b1728>] ib_uverbs_create_qp+0x1e5/0x684 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00ae3dd>] ib_uverbs_write+0xb7/0xc2 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffff810fe47f>] vfs_write+0xa7/0xee [<ffffffff810fe65f>] sys_write+0x45/0x69 [<ffffffff8138cdf9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: SRQ-uobj --> PD-uobj --> CQ-uobj Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(CQ-uobj); lock(PD-uobj); lock(CQ-uobj); lock(SRQ-uobj); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by ibv_srq_pingpon/2484: #0: (QP-uobj){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00b162c>] ib_uverbs_create_qp+0xe9/0x684 [ib_uverbs] #1: (PD-uobj){++++++}, at: [<ffffffffa00af51b>] idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] #2: (CQ-uobj){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffffa00af51b>] idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] stack backtrace: Pid: 2484, comm: ibv_srq_pingpon Not tainted 3.4.0-rc5+ #34 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8137eff0>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209 [<ffffffff81070898>] __lock_acquire+0xa29/0xd06 [<ffffffffa00af37c>] ? __idr_get_uobj+0x20/0x5e [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00af51b>] ? idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffff81070fd0>] lock_acquire+0xbf/0xfe [<ffffffffa00af51b>] ? idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffff81070eee>] ? lock_release+0x166/0x189 [<ffffffff81384f28>] down_read+0x34/0x43 [<ffffffffa00af51b>] ? idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00af51b>] idr_read_uobj+0x2f/0x4d [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00af542>] idr_read_obj+0x9/0x19 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffa00b1728>] ib_uverbs_create_qp+0x1e5/0x684 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffff81070fec>] ? lock_acquire+0xdb/0xfe [<ffffffff81070c09>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x94/0x213 [<ffffffff810d470f>] ? might_fault+0x40/0x90 [<ffffffff810d470f>] ? might_fault+0x40/0x90 [<ffffffffa00ae3dd>] ib_uverbs_write+0xb7/0xc2 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffff810fe47f>] vfs_write+0xa7/0xee [<ffffffff810ff736>] ? fget_light+0x3b/0x99 [<ffffffff810fe65f>] sys_write+0x45/0x69 [<ffffffff8138cdf9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Reported-by: NOr Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录