提交 57bf6eef 编写于 作者: J Joe Perches 提交者: David S. Miller

ixgb and e1000: Use new function for copybreak tests

There appears to be an off-by-1 defect in the maximum packet size
copied when copybreak is speified in these modules.

The copybreak module params are specified as:
"Maximum size of packet that is copied to a new buffer on receive"

The tests are changed from "< copybreak" to "<= copybreak"
and moved into new static functions for readability.
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 621b99b6
......@@ -3785,6 +3785,31 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
return cleaned;
}
/*
* this should improve performance for small packets with large amounts
* of reassembly being done in the stack
*/
static void e1000_check_copybreak(struct net_device *netdev,
struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info,
u32 length, struct sk_buff **skb)
{
struct sk_buff *new_skb;
if (length > copybreak)
return;
new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
if (!new_skb)
return;
skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, -NET_IP_ALIGN,
(*skb)->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
/* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
buffer_info->skb = *skb;
*skb = new_skb;
}
/**
* e1000_clean_rx_irq - Send received data up the network stack; legacy
* @adapter: board private structure
......@@ -3883,26 +3908,8 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
total_rx_bytes += length;
total_rx_packets++;
/* code added for copybreak, this should improve
* performance for small packets with large amounts
* of reassembly being done in the stack */
if (length < copybreak) {
struct sk_buff *new_skb =
netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
if (new_skb) {
skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb,
-NET_IP_ALIGN,
(skb->data -
NET_IP_ALIGN),
(length +
NET_IP_ALIGN));
/* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
buffer_info->skb = skb;
skb = new_skb;
}
/* else just continue with the old one */
}
/* end copybreak code */
e1000_check_copybreak(netdev, buffer_info, length, &skb);
skb_put(skb, length);
/* Receive Checksum Offload */
......
......@@ -1921,6 +1921,31 @@ ixgb_rx_checksum(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter,
}
}
/*
* this should improve performance for small packets with large amounts
* of reassembly being done in the stack
*/
static void ixgb_check_copybreak(struct net_device *netdev,
struct ixgb_buffer *buffer_info,
u32 length, struct sk_buff **skb)
{
struct sk_buff *new_skb;
if (length > copybreak)
return;
new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
if (!new_skb)
return;
skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, -NET_IP_ALIGN,
(*skb)->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
/* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
buffer_info->skb = *skb;
*skb = new_skb;
}
/**
* ixgb_clean_rx_irq - Send received data up the network stack,
* @adapter: board private structure
......@@ -1957,11 +1982,14 @@ ixgb_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter, int *work_done, int work_to_do)
prefetch(skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN);
if (++i == rx_ring->count) i = 0;
if (++i == rx_ring->count)
i = 0;
next_rxd = IXGB_RX_DESC(*rx_ring, i);
prefetch(next_rxd);
if ((j = i + 1) == rx_ring->count) j = 0;
j = i + 1;
if (j == rx_ring->count)
j = 0;
next2_buffer = &rx_ring->buffer_info[j];
prefetch(next2_buffer);
......@@ -1997,25 +2025,7 @@ ixgb_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter, int *work_done, int work_to_do)
goto rxdesc_done;
}
/* code added for copybreak, this should improve
* performance for small packets with large amounts
* of reassembly being done in the stack */
if (length < copybreak) {
struct sk_buff *new_skb =
netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length);
if (new_skb) {
skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb,
-NET_IP_ALIGN,
(skb->data -
NET_IP_ALIGN),
(length +
NET_IP_ALIGN));
/* save the skb in buffer_info as good */
buffer_info->skb = skb;
skb = new_skb;
}
}
/* end copybreak code */
ixgb_check_copybreak(netdev, buffer_info, length, &skb);
/* Good Receive */
skb_put(skb, length);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册