提交 50d75f8d 编写于 作者: O Oleg Nesterov 提交者: Linus Torvalds

pidns: find_new_reaper() can no longer switch to init_pid_ns.child_reaper

find_new_reaper() changes pid_ns->child_reaper, see add0d4df ("pid_ns:
zap_pid_ns_processes: fix the ->child_reaper changing").

The original reason has gone away after the previous patch, ->children
list must be empty after zap_pid_ns_processes().

However now we can not switch to init_pid_ns.child_reaper.
__unhash_process() relies on the "->child_reaper == parent" check, but
this check does not work if the last exiting task is also the child
reaper.

As Eric sugested, we can change __unhash_process() to use the parent's
pid_ns and remove this code.

Also, with this change we can move detach_pid(PIDTYPE_PID) back, where it
was before the previous fix.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@kerlabs.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Acked-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Tested-by: NAndrew Wagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 6347e900
...@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk); ...@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk);
static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead) static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
{ {
nr_threads--; nr_threads--;
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
if (group_dead) { if (group_dead) {
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID); detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID);
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_SID); detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_SID);
...@@ -78,13 +79,12 @@ static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead) ...@@ -78,13 +79,12 @@ static void __unhash_process(struct task_struct *p, bool group_dead)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PID_NS)) { if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PID_NS)) {
struct task_struct *parent = p->real_parent; struct task_struct *parent = p->real_parent;
if ((task_active_pid_ns(p)->child_reaper == parent) && if ((task_active_pid_ns(parent)->child_reaper == parent) &&
list_empty(&parent->children) && list_empty(&parent->children) &&
(parent->flags & PF_EXITING)) (parent->flags & PF_EXITING))
wake_up_process(parent); wake_up_process(parent);
} }
} }
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
list_del_rcu(&p->thread_group); list_del_rcu(&p->thread_group);
} }
...@@ -732,12 +732,6 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father) ...@@ -732,12 +732,6 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns); zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns);
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
/*
* We can not clear ->child_reaper or leave it alone.
* There may by stealth EXIT_DEAD tasks on ->children,
* forget_original_parent() must move them somewhere.
*/
pid_ns->child_reaper = init_pid_ns.child_reaper;
} else if (father->signal->has_child_subreaper) { } else if (father->signal->has_child_subreaper) {
struct task_struct *reaper; struct task_struct *reaper;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册