提交 4e717f5c 编写于 作者: G Glauber Costa 提交者: Al Viro

list_lru: remove special case function list_lru_dispose_all.

The list_lru implementation has one function, list_lru_dispose_all, with
only one user (the dentry code).  At first, such function appears to make
sense because we are really not interested in the result of isolating each
dentry separately - all of them are going away anyway.  However, it's
implementation is buggy in the following way:

When we call list_lru_dispose_all in fs/dcache.c, we scan all dentries
marking them with DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST.  However, this is done without the
nlru->lock taken.  The imediate result of that is that someone else may
add or remove the dentry from the LRU at the same time.  When list_lru_del
happens in that scenario we will see an element that is not yet marked
with DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST (even though it will be in the future) and
obviously remove it from an lru where the element no longer is.  Since
list_lru_dispose_all will in effect count down nlru's nr_items and
list_lru_del will do the same, this will lead to an imbalance.

The solution for this would not be so simple: we can obviously just keep
the lru_lock taken, but then we have no guarantees that we will be able to
acquire the dentry lock (dentry->d_lock).  To properly solve this, we need
a communication mechanism between the lru and dentry code, so they can
coordinate this with each other.

Such mechanism already exists in the form of the list_lru_walk_cb
callback.  So it is possible to construct a dcache-side prune function
that does the right thing only by calling list_lru_walk in a loop until no
more dentries are available.

With only one user, plus the fact that a sane solution for the problem
would involve boucing between dcache and list_lru anyway, I see little
justification to keep the special case list_lru_dispose_all in tree.
Signed-off-by: NGlauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
上级 6a4f496f
......@@ -956,27 +956,29 @@ long prune_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long nr_to_scan)
return freed;
}
/*
* Mark all the dentries as on being the dispose list so we don't think they are
* still on the LRU if we try to kill them from ascending the parent chain in
* try_prune_one_dentry() rather than directly from the dispose list.
*/
static void
shrink_dcache_list(
struct list_head *dispose)
static enum lru_status dentry_lru_isolate_shrink(struct list_head *item,
spinlock_t *lru_lock, void *arg)
{
struct dentry *dentry;
struct list_head *freeable = arg;
struct dentry *dentry = container_of(item, struct dentry, d_lru);
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(dentry, dispose, d_lru) {
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST;
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
shrink_dentry_list(dispose);
/*
* we are inverting the lru lock/dentry->d_lock here,
* so use a trylock. If we fail to get the lock, just skip
* it
*/
if (!spin_trylock(&dentry->d_lock))
return LRU_SKIP;
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST;
list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, freeable);
this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
return LRU_REMOVED;
}
/**
* shrink_dcache_sb - shrink dcache for a superblock
* @sb: superblock
......@@ -986,10 +988,17 @@ shrink_dcache_list(
*/
void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
{
long disposed;
long freed;
do {
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
freed = list_lru_walk(&sb->s_dentry_lru,
dentry_lru_isolate_shrink, &dispose, UINT_MAX);
disposed = list_lru_dispose_all(&sb->s_dentry_lru, shrink_dcache_list);
this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, disposed);
this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, freed);
shrink_dentry_list(&dispose);
} while (freed > 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrink_dcache_sb);
......
......@@ -137,21 +137,4 @@ list_lru_walk(struct list_lru *lru, list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
}
return isolated;
}
typedef void (*list_lru_dispose_cb)(struct list_head *dispose_list);
/**
* list_lru_dispose_all: forceably flush all elements in an @lru
* @lru: the lru pointer
* @dispose: callback function to be called for each lru list.
*
* This function will forceably isolate all elements into the dispose list, and
* call the @dispose callback to flush the list. Please note that the callback
* should expect items in any state, clean or dirty, and be able to flush all of
* them.
*
* Return value: how many objects were freed. It should be equal to all objects
* in the list_lru.
*/
unsigned long
list_lru_dispose_all(struct list_lru *lru, list_lru_dispose_cb dispose);
#endif /* _LRU_LIST_H */
......@@ -112,48 +112,6 @@ list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_walk_node);
static unsigned long list_lru_dispose_all_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
list_lru_dispose_cb dispose)
{
struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
LIST_HEAD(dispose_list);
unsigned long disposed = 0;
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
while (!list_empty(&nlru->list)) {
list_splice_init(&nlru->list, &dispose_list);
disposed += nlru->nr_items;
nlru->nr_items = 0;
node_clear(nid, lru->active_nodes);
spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
dispose(&dispose_list);
spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
}
spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
return disposed;
}
unsigned long list_lru_dispose_all(struct list_lru *lru,
list_lru_dispose_cb dispose)
{
unsigned long disposed;
unsigned long total = 0;
int nid;
do {
disposed = 0;
for_each_node_mask(nid, lru->active_nodes) {
disposed += list_lru_dispose_all_node(lru, nid,
dispose);
}
total += disposed;
} while (disposed != 0);
return total;
}
int list_lru_init(struct list_lru *lru)
{
int i;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册