提交 4c9d6c18 编写于 作者: S Sukadev Bhattiprolu 提交者: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf test: Remove 'core_id' check in topo test

The topology test case of 'perf test' seems to be broken on my x86
system - due to the comparison of a "core-id" with # of CPUs online.

There are 8 online CPUs:

	$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
	0-7

but core-ids are not sequential and some core-ids exceed the number
of online CPUs.

	$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu?/topology/core_id
	0
	1
	9
	10
	0
	1
	9
	10

Looks like we can safely remove the check.  Output before:

	$ perf --version
	perf version 4.4.rc1.g34258a

	$ perf test -v topo
	36: Test topology in session                                 :
	--- start ---
	test child forked, pid 5906
	templ file: /tmp/perf-test-vCwWG3
	core_id number is too big.You may need to upgrade the perf tool.
	test child interrupted
	---- end ----
	Test topology in session: FAILED!

and after:

	$ perf test -v topo
	36: Test topology in session                                 :
	--- start ---
	test child forked, pid 6532
	templ file: /tmp/perf-test-y10wFJ
	CPU 0, core 0, socket 0
	CPU 1, core 1, socket 0
	CPU 2, core 9, socket 0
	CPU 3, core 10, socket 0
	CPU 4, core 0, socket 1
	CPU 5, core 1, socket 1
	CPU 6, core 9, socket 1
	CPU 7, core 10, socket 1
	test child finished with 0
	---- end ----
	Test topology in session: Ok
Signed-off-by: NSukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151203233219.GA27696@us.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
上级 ced30bc9
......@@ -1872,11 +1872,6 @@ static int process_cpu_topology(struct perf_file_section *section,
if (ph->needs_swap)
nr = bswap_32(nr);
if (nr > (u32)cpu_nr) {
pr_debug("core_id number is too big."
"You may need to upgrade the perf tool.\n");
goto free_cpu;
}
ph->env.cpu[i].core_id = nr;
ret = readn(fd, &nr, sizeof(nr));
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册