提交 48be0eb0 编写于 作者: J Jann Horn 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: call pipe_buf_release() under pipe lock

commit 9509941e9c534920ccc4771ae70bd6cbbe79df1c upstream.

Some of the pipe_buf_release() handlers seem to assume that the pipe is
locked - in particular, anon_pipe_buf_release() accesses pipe->tmp_page
without taking any extra locks. From a glance through the callers of
pipe_buf_release(), it looks like FUSE is the only one that calls
pipe_buf_release() without having the pipe locked.

This bug should only lead to a memory leak, nothing terrible.

Fixes: dd3bb14f ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
上级 a57ab2e7
......@@ -2032,8 +2032,10 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
ret = fuse_dev_do_write(fud, &cs, len);
pipe_lock(pipe);
for (idx = 0; idx < nbuf; idx++)
pipe_buf_release(pipe, &bufs[idx]);
pipe_unlock(pipe);
out:
kvfree(bufs);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册