提交 46dad760 编写于 作者: J Jeff Layton

locks: clean up comment typo

Acked-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
上级 24cbe784
...@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) ...@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
* it seems like the reasonable thing to do. * it seems like the reasonable thing to do.
* *
* Must be called with both the i_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The fl_block * Must be called with both the i_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The fl_block
* list itself is protected by the file_lock_list, but by ensuring that the * list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring that the
* i_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the blocked_lock_lock * i_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the blocked_lock_lock
* in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty. * in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty.
*/ */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册