提交 3e777f99 编写于 作者: S Steven Rostedt (VMware) 提交者: Ingo Molnar

sched/rt: Add comments describing the RT IPI pull method

While looking into optimizations for the RT scheduler IPI logic, I realized
that the comments are lacking to describe it efficiently. It deserves a
lengthy description describing its design.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170228155030.30c69068@gandalf.local.home
[ Small typographical edits. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 2317d5f1
......@@ -1927,6 +1927,87 @@ static int find_next_push_cpu(struct rq *rq)
#define RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING 1
#define RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART 2
/*
* When a high priority task schedules out from a CPU and a lower priority
* task is scheduled in, a check is made to see if there's any RT tasks
* on other CPUs that are waiting to run because a higher priority RT task
* is currently running on its CPU. In this case, the CPU with multiple RT
* tasks queued on it (overloaded) needs to be notified that a CPU has opened
* up that may be able to run one of its non-running queued RT tasks.
*
* On large CPU boxes, there's the case that several CPUs could schedule
* a lower priority task at the same time, in which case it will look for
* any overloaded CPUs that it could pull a task from. To do this, the runqueue
* lock must be taken from that overloaded CPU. Having 10s of CPUs all fighting
* for a single overloaded CPU's runqueue lock can produce a large latency.
* (This has actually been observed on large boxes running cyclictest).
* Instead of taking the runqueue lock of the overloaded CPU, each of the
* CPUs that scheduled a lower priority task simply sends an IPI to the
* overloaded CPU. An IPI is much cheaper than taking an runqueue lock with
* lots of contention. The overloaded CPU will look to push its non-running
* RT task off, and if it does, it can then ignore the other IPIs coming
* in, and just pass those IPIs off to any other overloaded CPU.
*
* When a CPU schedules a lower priority task, it only sends an IPI to
* the "next" CPU that has overloaded RT tasks. This prevents IPI storms,
* as having 10 CPUs scheduling lower priority tasks and 10 CPUs with
* RT overloaded tasks, would cause 100 IPIs to go out at once.
*
* The overloaded RT CPU, when receiving an IPI, will try to push off its
* overloaded RT tasks and then send an IPI to the next CPU that has
* overloaded RT tasks. This stops when all CPUs with overloaded RT tasks
* have completed. Just because a CPU may have pushed off its own overloaded
* RT task does not mean it should stop sending the IPI around to other
* overloaded CPUs. There may be another RT task waiting to run on one of
* those CPUs that are of higher priority than the one that was just
* pushed.
*
* An optimization that could possibly be made is to make a CPU array similar
* to the cpupri array mask of all running RT tasks, but for the overloaded
* case, then the IPI could be sent to only the CPU with the highest priority
* RT task waiting, and that CPU could send off further IPIs to the CPU with
* the next highest waiting task. Since the overloaded case is much less likely
* to happen, the complexity of this implementation may not be worth it.
* Instead, just send an IPI around to all overloaded CPUs.
*
* The rq->rt.push_flags holds the status of the IPI that is going around.
* A run queue can only send out a single IPI at a time. The possible flags
* for rq->rt.push_flags are:
*
* (None or zero): No IPI is going around for the current rq
* RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING: An IPI for the rq is being passed around
* RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART: The priority of the running task for the rq
* has changed, and the IPI should restart
* circulating the overloaded CPUs again.
*
* rq->rt.push_cpu contains the CPU that is being sent the IPI. It is updated
* before sending to the next CPU.
*
* Instead of having all CPUs that schedule a lower priority task send
* an IPI to the same "first" CPU in the RT overload mask, they send it
* to the next overloaded CPU after their own CPU. This helps distribute
* the work when there's more than one overloaded CPU and multiple CPUs
* scheduling in lower priority tasks.
*
* When a rq schedules a lower priority task than what was currently
* running, the next CPU with overloaded RT tasks is examined first.
* That is, if CPU 1 and 5 are overloaded, and CPU 3 schedules a lower
* priority task, it will send an IPI first to CPU 5, then CPU 5 will
* send to CPU 1 if it is still overloaded. CPU 1 will clear the
* rq->rt.push_flags if RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART is not set.
*
* The first CPU to notice IPI_RESTART is set, will clear that flag and then
* send an IPI to the next overloaded CPU after the rq->cpu and not the next
* CPU after push_cpu. That is, if CPU 1, 4 and 5 are overloaded when CPU 3
* schedules a lower priority task, and the IPI_RESTART gets set while the
* handling is being done on CPU 5, it will clear the flag and send it back to
* CPU 4 instead of CPU 1.
*
* Note, the above logic can be disabled by turning off the sched_feature
* RT_PUSH_IPI. Then the rq lock of the overloaded CPU will simply be
* taken by the CPU requesting a pull and the waiting RT task will be pulled
* by that CPU. This may be fine for machines with few CPUs.
*/
static void tell_cpu_to_push(struct rq *rq)
{
int cpu;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册