提交 3cc31a0d 编写于 作者: D David Sterba

btrfs: pass number of devices to btrfs_check_raid_min_devices

Before this patch, btrfs_check_raid_min_devices would do an off-by-one
check of the constraints and not the miminmum check, as its name
suggests. This is not a problem if the only caller is device remove, but
would be confusing for others.

Add an argument with the exact number and let the caller(s) decide if
this needs any adjustments, like when device replace is running.
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
上级 f47ab258
......@@ -1706,20 +1706,17 @@ static int btrfs_rm_dev_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
return ret;
}
static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
/*
* Verify that @num_devices satisfies the RAID profile constraints in the whole
* filesystem. It's up to the caller to adjust that number regarding eg. device
* replace.
*/
static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 num_devices)
{
u64 all_avail;
u64 num_devices;
unsigned seq;
num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices;
btrfs_dev_replace_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace, 0);
if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) {
WARN_ON(num_devices < 1);
num_devices--;
}
btrfs_dev_replace_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace, 0);
do {
seq = read_seqbegin(&fs_info->profiles_lock);
......@@ -1728,21 +1725,21 @@ static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits;
} while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq));
if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) && num_devices <= 4) {
if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) && num_devices < 4) {
return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID10_MIN_NOT_MET;
}
if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) && num_devices <= 2) {
if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) && num_devices < 2) {
return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1_MIN_NOT_MET;
}
if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5) &&
fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices <= 2) {
fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices < 2) {
return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID5_MIN_NOT_MET;
}
if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6) &&
fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices <= 3) {
fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices < 3) {
return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID6_MIN_NOT_MET;
}
......@@ -1761,7 +1758,15 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path, u64 devid)
mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
ret = btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(root->fs_info);
num_devices = root->fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices;
btrfs_dev_replace_lock(&root->fs_info->dev_replace, 0);
if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&root->fs_info->dev_replace)) {
WARN_ON(num_devices < 1);
num_devices--;
}
btrfs_dev_replace_unlock(&root->fs_info->dev_replace, 0);
ret = btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(root->fs_info, num_devices - 1);
if (ret)
goto out;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册