timekeeping: Add debugging checks to warn if we see delays

Recently there's been requests for better sanity
checking in the time code, so that it's more clear
when something is going wrong, since timekeeping issues
could manifest in a large number of strange ways in
various subsystems.

Thus, this patch adds some extra infrastructure to
add a check to update_wall_time() to print two new
warnings:

 1) if we see the call delayed beyond the 'max_cycles'
    overflow point,

 2) or if we see the call delayed beyond the clocksource's
    'max_idle_ns' value, which is currently 50% of the
    overflow point.

This extra infrastructure is conditional on
a new CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING option, also
added in this patch - default off.

Tested this a bit by halting qemu for specified
lengths of time to trigger the warnings.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426133800-29329-5-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
[ Improved the changelog and the messages a bit. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

kernel/time/jiffies.c

@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_jiffies = {
 	.mask		= 0xffffffff, /*32bits*/
 	.mult		= NSEC_PER_JIFFY << JIFFIES_SHIFT, /* details above */
 	.shift		= JIFFIES_SHIFT,
+	.max_cycles	= 10,
 };
 
 __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SEQLOCK(jiffies_lock);

kernel/time/timekeeping.c

@@ -118,6 +118,31 @@ static inline void tk_update_sleep_time(struct timekeeper *tk, ktime_t delta)
 	tk->offs_boot = ktime_add(tk->offs_boot, delta);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING
+static void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset)
+{
+
+	cycle_t max_cycles = tk->tkr.clock->max_cycles;
+	const char *name = tk->tkr.clock->name;
+
+	if (offset > max_cycles) {
+		printk_deferred("WARNING: timekeeping: Cycle offset (%lld) is larger than allowed by the '%s' clock's max_cycles value (%lld): time overflow\n",
+				offset, name, max_cycles);
+		printk_deferred("         timekeeping: Your kernel is sick, but tries to cope\n");
+	} else {
+		if (offset > (max_cycles >> 1)) {
+			printk_deferred("INFO: timekeeping: Cycle offset (%lld) is larger than the the '%s' clock's 50%% safety margin (%lld)\n",
+					offset, name, max_cycles >> 1);
+			printk_deferred("      timekeeping: Your kernel is still fine, but is feeling a bit nervous\n");
+		}
+	}
+}
+#else
+static inline void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * tk_setup_internals - Set up internals to use clocksource clock.
  *
@@ -1630,6 +1655,9 @@ void update_wall_time(void)
 	if (offset < real_tk->cycle_interval)
 		goto out;
 
+	/* Do some additional sanity checking */
+	timekeeping_check_update(real_tk, offset);
+
 	/*
 	 * With NO_HZ we may have to accumulate many cycle_intervals
 	 * (think "ticks") worth of time at once. To do this efficiently,

lib/Kconfig.debug

@@ -865,6 +865,19 @@ config SCHED_STACK_END_CHECK
 	  data corruption or a sporadic crash at a later stage once the region
 	  is examined. The runtime overhead introduced is minimal.
 
+config DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING
+	bool "Enable extra timekeeping sanity checking"
+	help
+	  This option will enable additional timekeeping sanity checks
+	  which may be helpful when diagnosing issues where timekeeping
+	  problems are suspected.
+
+	  This may include checks in the timekeeping hotpaths, so this
+	  option may have a (very small) performance impact to some
+	  workloads.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config TIMER_STATS
 	bool "Collect kernel timers statistics"
 	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && PROC_FS