Merge branch 'reciprocal'
Hannes Frederic Sowa says: ==================== reciprocal_divide update This patch is on top of aee636c4 ("bpf: do not use reciprocal divide") from Eric that sits in net tree. It will not create a merge conflict, but it depends on this one, so we suggest, if possible, to merge net into net-next. We are proposing this change with only small modifications from the v2 version, namely updating the name of trim to reciprocal_scale (as commented on by Ben Hutchings and Eric Dumazet, thanks!). We thought about introducing the reciprocal_divide algorithm in parallel to the one already used by the kernel but faced organizational issues, leading us to the conclusion that it is best to just replace the old one: We could not come up with names for the different implementations and also with a way to describe the differences to guide developers which one to choose in which situation. This is because we cannot specify the correct semantics for the version which is currently used by the kernel. Altough it seems to not be causing problems in the kernel, we cannot surely say so in the case of flex_array for the future. Current usage seems ok, but future users could run into problems. Changelog: v1->v2: - changed name to prandom_u32_max in p1 - changed name to trim in p2 - reworked code in p3 v2->v3: - p1 and p3 stays unchanged, only small update in commit message in p3 - changed name to reciprocal_scale in p2 - fixed kernel doc format v3->v4: - pseduo -> pseudo (thanks to Tilman Schmidt) v4->v5: - fix pseduo -> pseudo for real now, sorry for the noise ==================== Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录