drm/i915: bounds check execbuffer relocation count

It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
relocation copies. This could lead to heap writing overflows.

CVE-2013-0913

v3: collapse test, improve comment
v2: move check into validate_exec_list
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Pinkie Pie
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c

@@ -732,6 +732,8 @@ validate_exec_list(struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *exec,
 		   int count)
 {
 	int i;
+	int relocs_total = 0;
+	int relocs_max = INT_MAX / sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
 		char __user *ptr = (char __user *)(uintptr_t)exec[i].relocs_ptr;
@@ -740,10 +742,13 @@ validate_exec_list(struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *exec,
 		if (exec[i].flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_UNKNOWN_FLAGS)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		/* First check for malicious input causing overflow */
-		if (exec[i].relocation_count >
-		    INT_MAX / sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry))
+		/* First check for malicious input causing overflow in
+		 * the worst case where we need to allocate the entire
+		 * relocation tree as a single array.
+		 */
+		if (exec[i].relocation_count > relocs_max - relocs_total)
 			return -EINVAL;
+		relocs_total += exec[i].relocation_count;
 
 		length = exec[i].relocation_count *
 			sizeof(struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry);