提交 2fffad12 编写于 作者: L Linus Torvalds

Merge tag 'mmc-v4.6-rc3' of git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc

Pull MMC fixes from Ulf Hansson:
 "Here are a couple of mmc fixes intended for v4.6 rc4.

  Regarding the fix for the regression about mmcblk device indexes.  The
  approach taken to solve the problem seems to be good enough.  There
  were some discussions around the solution, but it seems like people
  were happy about it in the end.

  MMC core:
   - Restore similar old behaviour when assigning mmcblk device indexes

  MMC host:
   - tegra: Disable UHS-I modes for Tegra124 to fix regression"

* tag 'mmc-v4.6-rc3' of git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc:
  mmc: tegra: Disable UHS-I modes for Tegra124
  mmc: block: Use the mmc host device index as the mmcblk device index
......@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static int max_devices;
/* TODO: Replace these with struct ida */
static DECLARE_BITMAP(dev_use, MAX_DEVICES);
static DECLARE_BITMAP(name_use, MAX_DEVICES);
/*
* There is one mmc_blk_data per slot.
......@@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ struct mmc_blk_data {
unsigned int usage;
unsigned int read_only;
unsigned int part_type;
unsigned int name_idx;
unsigned int reset_done;
#define MMC_BLK_READ BIT(0)
#define MMC_BLK_WRITE BIT(1)
......@@ -2202,19 +2200,6 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card,
goto out;
}
/*
* !subname implies we are creating main mmc_blk_data that will be
* associated with mmc_card with dev_set_drvdata. Due to device
* partitions, devidx will not coincide with a per-physical card
* index anymore so we keep track of a name index.
*/
if (!subname) {
md->name_idx = find_first_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices);
__set_bit(md->name_idx, name_use);
} else
md->name_idx = ((struct mmc_blk_data *)
dev_to_disk(parent)->private_data)->name_idx;
md->area_type = area_type;
/*
......@@ -2264,7 +2249,7 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card,
*/
snprintf(md->disk->disk_name, sizeof(md->disk->disk_name),
"mmcblk%u%s", md->name_idx, subname ? subname : "");
"mmcblk%u%s", card->host->index, subname ? subname : "");
if (mmc_card_mmc(card))
blk_queue_logical_block_size(md->queue.queue,
......@@ -2418,7 +2403,6 @@ static void mmc_blk_remove_parts(struct mmc_card *card,
struct list_head *pos, *q;
struct mmc_blk_data *part_md;
__clear_bit(md->name_idx, name_use);
list_for_each_safe(pos, q, &md->part) {
part_md = list_entry(pos, struct mmc_blk_data, part);
list_del(pos);
......
......@@ -382,14 +382,6 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra114 = {
.pdata = &sdhci_tegra114_pdata,
};
static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra124 = {
.pdata = &sdhci_tegra114_pdata,
.nvquirks = NVQUIRK_ENABLE_SDR50 |
NVQUIRK_ENABLE_DDR50 |
NVQUIRK_ENABLE_SDR104 |
NVQUIRK_HAS_PADCALIB,
};
static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_tegra210_pdata = {
.quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL |
SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK |
......@@ -407,7 +399,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra210 = {
static const struct of_device_id sdhci_tegra_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-sdhci", .data = &soc_data_tegra210 },
{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-sdhci", .data = &soc_data_tegra124 },
{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-sdhci", .data = &soc_data_tegra114 },
{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-sdhci", .data = &soc_data_tegra114 },
{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-sdhci", .data = &soc_data_tegra30 },
{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-sdhci", .data = &soc_data_tegra20 },
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册