提交 2bd2c194 编写于 作者: C Chuck Lever 提交者: Al Viro

MAX_LFS_FILESIZE should be a loff_t

fs/nfs/internal.h: In function ‘nfs_super_set_maxbytes’:
fs/nfs/internal.h:547:21: warning: comparison between signed and
    unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]

Seen with gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2).

Commit 42cb56ae made s_maxbytes a loff_t, thus the type of
MAX_LFS_FILESIZE should also be a loff_t.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
上级 8f9c0119
......@@ -1130,9 +1130,9 @@ static inline int file_check_writeable(struct file *filp)
/* Page cache limit. The filesystems should put that into their s_maxbytes
limits, otherwise bad things can happen in VM. */
#if BITS_PER_LONG==32
#define MAX_LFS_FILESIZE (((u64)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE << (BITS_PER_LONG-1))-1)
#define MAX_LFS_FILESIZE (((loff_t)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE << (BITS_PER_LONG-1))-1)
#elif BITS_PER_LONG==64
#define MAX_LFS_FILESIZE 0x7fffffffffffffffUL
#define MAX_LFS_FILESIZE ((loff_t)0x7fffffffffffffff)
#endif
#define FL_POSIX 1
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册