i2c: imx: reduce load by using usleep_range instead of udelay
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt recommends to use usleep_range on delays > 10usec. According to my test results with Neonode zForce touchscreen driver, usleep_range indeed reduces CPU load. Stats collected with "./perf record -a -g -F 1000 sleep 10" i2c-imx with udelay(50): 34.19% 0.00% irq/220-Neonode [kernel.kallsyms] [k] irq_thread ---irq_thread |--33.75%--irq_thread_fn | |--19.27%--0x7f08a878 | | i2c_master_recv | | i2c_transfer | | __i2c_transfer | | i2c_imx_xfer | | |--11.71%--i2c_imx_trx_complete | | |--5.70%--i2c_imx_start <<<<---------------- | | | |--5.38%--__timer_const_udelay | | | | __timer_delay | | | | --5.07%--read_current_timer i2c-imx with usleep_range(50,100) 29.08% 0.00% irq/220-Neonode [kernel.kallsyms] [k] irq_thread ---irq_thread |--28.89%--irq_thread_fn | |--17.21%--0x7f08a878 | | i2c_master_recv | | |--17.14%--i2c_transfer | | | __i2c_transfer | | | i2c_imx_xfer | | | |--14.29%--i2c_imx_trx_complete | | | |--1.42%--i2c_imx_start <<<<---------- | | | | |--0.71%--usleep_range | | | | |--0.53%--i2c_imx_bus_busy Signed-off-by: NOleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> Signed-off-by: NDirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com> Reviewed-by: NVladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: NWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录