提交 2a27753f 编写于 作者: V Vikram Pandita 提交者: Santosh Shilimkar

omap: sram: fix is_sram_locked check

For OMAP24xx/34xx/44xx: omap_type() returns the correct type:
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_TEST
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_EMU
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_SEC
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_BAD

In current implementation there are two problems:
Problem 1:
For 34xx, the current if check will never return true.

Problem 2:
For 24xx the correct type check should be with omap_type() function
Verified by checking the TRM 24xx for CONTROL_STATUS register bits
Signed-off-by: NVikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
上级 b30a3f62
...@@ -93,16 +93,7 @@ extern unsigned long omapfb_reserve_sram(unsigned long sram_pstart, ...@@ -93,16 +93,7 @@ extern unsigned long omapfb_reserve_sram(unsigned long sram_pstart,
*/ */
static int is_sram_locked(void) static int is_sram_locked(void)
{ {
int type = 0; if (OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP == omap_type()) {
if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
/* Not yet supported */
return 0;
if (cpu_is_omap242x())
type = omap_rev() & OMAP2_DEVICETYPE_MASK;
if (type == GP_DEVICE) {
/* RAMFW: R/W access to all initiators for all qualifier sets */ /* RAMFW: R/W access to all initiators for all qualifier sets */
if (cpu_is_omap242x()) { if (cpu_is_omap242x()) {
__raw_writel(0xFF, OMAP24XX_VA_REQINFOPERM0); /* all q-vects */ __raw_writel(0xFF, OMAP24XX_VA_REQINFOPERM0); /* all q-vects */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册