mistaken ext4_inode_bitmap for ext4_block_bitmap

In ext4_new_blocks(), one of two ext4_block_bitmap() calls should be
ext4_inode_bitmap() call.  It is not harmful in normal processing, but it
should be fixed.
Signed-off-by: NToshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

fs/ext4/balloc.c

@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 	ret_block = grp_alloc_blk + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group_no);
 
 	if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
-	    in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
+	    in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) ||
 	    in_range(ret_block, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),
 		     EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group) ||
 	    in_range(ret_block + num - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp),