Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
提交 27af5eea 编写于 作者: T Tvrtko Ursulin
浏览文件
操作

drm/i915: Move execlists irq handler to a bottom half 

Doing a lot of work in the interrupt handler introduces huge
latencies to the system as a whole.

Most dramatic effect can be seen by running an all engine
stress test like igt/gem_exec_nop/all where, when the kernel
config is lean enough, the whole system can be brought into
multi-second periods of complete non-interactivty. That can
look for example like this:

 NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [kworker/u8:3:143]
 Modules linked in: [redacted for brevity]
 CPU: 0 PID: 143 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Tainted: G     U       L  4.5.0-160321+ #183
 Hardware name: Intel Corporation Broadwell Client platform/WhiteTip Mountain 1
 Workqueue: i915 gen6_pm_rps_work [i915]
 task: ffff8800aae88000 ti: ffff8800aae90000 task.ti: ffff8800aae90000
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8104a3c2>]  [<ffffffff8104a3c2>] __do_softirq+0x72/0x1d0
 RSP: 0000:ffff88014f403f38  EFLAGS: 00000206
 RAX: ffff8800aae94000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000000006e0
 RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000004208060 RDI: 0000000000215d80
 RBP: ffff88014f403f80 R08: 0000000b1b42c180 R09: 0000000000000022
 R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 000000000000a030
 R13: 0000000000000082 R14: ffff8800aa4d0080 R15: 0000000000000082
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88014f400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007fa53b90c000 CR3: 0000000001a0a000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 Stack:
  042080601b33869f ffff8800aae94000 00000000fffc2678 ffff88010000000a
  0000000000000000 000000000000a030 0000000000005302 ffff8800aa4d0080
  0000000000000206 ffff88014f403f90 ffffffff8104a716 ffff88014f403fa8
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  [<ffffffff8104a716>] irq_exit+0x86/0x90
  [<ffffffff81031e7d>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3d/0x50
  [<ffffffff814f3eac>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x7c/0x90
  <EOI>
  [<ffffffffa01c5b40>] ? gen8_write64+0x1a0/0x1a0 [i915]
  [<ffffffff814f2b39>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x9/0x20
  [<ffffffffa01c5c44>] gen8_write32+0x104/0x1a0 [i915]
  [<ffffffff8132c6a2>] ? n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x372/0xae0
  [<ffffffffa017cc9e>] gen6_set_rps_thresholds+0x1be/0x330 [i915]
  [<ffffffffa017eaf0>] gen6_set_rps+0x70/0x200 [i915]
  [<ffffffffa0185375>] intel_set_rps+0x25/0x30 [i915]
  [<ffffffffa01768fd>] gen6_pm_rps_work+0x10d/0x2e0 [i915]
  [<ffffffff81063852>] ? finish_task_switch+0x72/0x1c0
  [<ffffffff8105ab29>] process_one_work+0x139/0x350
  [<ffffffff8105b186>] worker_thread+0x126/0x490
  [<ffffffff8105b060>] ? rescuer_thread+0x320/0x320
  [<ffffffff8105fa64>] kthread+0xc4/0xe0
  [<ffffffff8105f9a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
  [<ffffffff814f351f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
  [<ffffffff8105f9a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170

I could not explain, or find a code path, which would explain
a +20 second lockup, but from some instrumentation it was
apparent the interrupts off proportion of time was between
10-25% under heavy load which is quite bad.

When a interrupt "cliff" is reached, which was >~320k irq/s on
my machine, the whole system goes into a terrible state of the
above described multi-second lockups.

By moving the GT interrupt handling to a tasklet in a most
simple way, the problem above disappears completely.

Testing the effect on sytem-wide latencies using
igt/gem_syslatency shows the following before this patch:

gem_syslatency: cycles=1532739, latency mean=416531.829us max=2499237us
gem_syslatency: cycles=1839434, latency mean=1458099.157us max=4998944us
gem_syslatency: cycles=1432570, latency mean=2688.451us max=1201185us
gem_syslatency: cycles=1533543, latency mean=416520.499us max=2498886us

This shows that the unrelated process is experiencing huge
delays in its wake-up latency. After the patch the results
look like this:

gem_syslatency: cycles=808907, latency mean=53.133us max=1640us
gem_syslatency: cycles=862154, latency mean=62.778us max=2117us
gem_syslatency: cycles=856039, latency mean=58.079us max=2123us
gem_syslatency: cycles=841683, latency mean=56.914us max=1667us

Showing a huge improvement in the unrelated process wake-up
latency. It also shows an approximate halving in the number
of total empty batches submitted during the test. This may
not be worrying since the test puts the driver under
a very unrealistic load with ncpu threads doing empty batch
submission to all GPU engines each.

Another benefit compared to the hard-irq handling is that now
work on all engines can be dispatched in parallel since we can
have up to number of CPUs active tasklets. (While previously
a single hard-irq would serially dispatch on one engine after
another.)

More interesting scenario with regards to throughput is
"gem_latency -n 100" which  shows 25% better throughput and
CPU usage, and 14% better dispatch latencies.

I did not find any gains or regressions with Synmark2 or
GLbench under light testing. More benchmarking is certainly
required.

v2:
   * execlists_lock should be taken as spin_lock_bh when
     queuing work from userspace now. (Chris Wilson)
   * uncore.lock must be taken with spin_lock_irq when
     submitting requests since that now runs from either
     softirq or process context.

v3:
   * Expanded commit message with more testing data;
   * converted missed locking sites to _bh;
   * added execlist_lock comment. (Chris Wilson)

v4:
   * Mention dispatch parallelism in commit. (Chris Wilson)
   * Do not hold uncore.lock over MMIO reads since the block
     is already serialised per-engine via the tasklet itself.
     (Chris Wilson)
   * intel_lrc_irq_handler should be static. (Chris Wilson)
   * Cancel/sync the tasklet on GPU reset. (Chris Wilson)
   * Document and WARN that tasklet cannot be active/pending
     on engine cleanup. (Chris Wilson/Imre Deak)
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_nop/all
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94350Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1459768316-6670-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
上级 183aec16
隐藏空白更改
内联 并排
Showing with 33 addition and 24 deletion
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
浏览文件 @ 27af5eea
......@@ -2100,7 +2100,6 @@ static int i915_execlists(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv) {
struct drm_i915_gem_request *head_req = NULL;
int count = 0;
unsigned long flags;
seq_printf(m, "%s\n", engine->name);
......@@ -2127,13 +2126,13 @@ static int i915_execlists(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
i, status, ctx_id);
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->execlist_lock, flags);
spin_lock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
list_for_each(cursor, &engine->execlist_queue)
count++;
head_req = list_first_entry_or_null(&engine->execlist_queue,
struct drm_i915_gem_request,
execlist_link);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->execlist_lock, flags);
spin_unlock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
seq_printf(m, "\t%d requests in queue\n", count);
if (head_req) {
......
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
浏览文件 @ 27af5eea
......@@ -2842,13 +2842,15 @@ static void i915_gem_reset_engine_cleanup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
*/
if (i915.enable_execlists) {
spin_lock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
/* Ensure irq handler finishes or is cancelled. */
tasklet_kill(&engine->irq_tasklet);
spin_lock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
/* list_splice_tail_init checks for empty lists */
list_splice_tail_init(&engine->execlist_queue,
&engine->execlist_retired_req_list);
spin_unlock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
intel_execlists_retire_requests(engine);
}
......@@ -2968,9 +2970,9 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests(struct drm_device *dev)
i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(engine);
idle &= list_empty(&engine->request_list);
if (i915.enable_execlists) {
spin_lock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
idle &= list_empty(&engine->execlist_queue);
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
intel_execlists_retire_requests(engine);
}
......
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
浏览文件 @ 27af5eea
......@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir, int test_shift)
if (iir & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << test_shift))
notify_ring(engine);
if (iir & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << test_shift))
intel_lrc_irq_handler(engine);
tasklet_schedule(&engine->irq_tasklet);
}
static irqreturn_t gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
......
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
浏览文件 @ 27af5eea
......@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@
* preemption, but just sampling the new tail pointer).
*
*/
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <drm/drmP.h>
#include <drm/i915_drm.h>
......@@ -418,20 +419,18 @@ static void execlists_submit_requests(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = rq0->i915;
/* BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled()); */
execlists_update_context(rq0);
if (rq1)
execlists_update_context(rq1);
spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
execlists_elsp_write(rq0, rq1);
intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
spin_unlock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
}
static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
......@@ -538,13 +537,14 @@ get_context_status(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, unsigned int read_pointer,
/**
* intel_lrc_irq_handler() - handle Context Switch interrupts
* @ring: Engine Command Streamer to handle.
* @engine: Engine Command Streamer to handle.
*
* Check the unread Context Status Buffers and manage the submission of new
* contexts to the ELSP accordingly.
*/
void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine = (struct intel_engine_cs *)data;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->dev->dev_private;
u32 status_pointer;
unsigned int read_pointer, write_pointer;
......@@ -552,8 +552,7 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
unsigned int csb_read = 0, i;
unsigned int submit_contexts = 0;
spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
status_pointer = I915_READ_FW(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(engine));
......@@ -578,8 +577,7 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
_MASKED_FIELD(GEN8_CSB_READ_PTR_MASK,
engine->next_context_status_buffer << 8));
intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
spin_unlock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
spin_lock(&engine->execlist_lock);
......@@ -621,7 +619,7 @@ static void execlists_context_queue(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
i915_gem_request_reference(request);
spin_lock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
list_for_each_entry(cursor, &engine->execlist_queue, execlist_link)
if (++num_elements > 2)
......@@ -646,7 +644,7 @@ static void execlists_context_queue(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
if (num_elements == 0)
execlists_context_unqueue(engine);
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
}
static int logical_ring_invalidate_all_caches(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
......@@ -1033,9 +1031,9 @@ void intel_execlists_retire_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
return;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&retired_list);
spin_lock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
list_replace_init(&engine->execlist_retired_req_list, &retired_list);
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &retired_list, execlist_link) {
struct intel_context *ctx = req->ctx;
......@@ -2016,6 +2014,13 @@ void intel_logical_ring_cleanup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
if (!intel_engine_initialized(engine))
return;
/*
* Tasklet cannot be active at this point due intel_mark_active/idle
* so this is just for documentation.
*/
if (WARN_ON(test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &engine->irq_tasklet.state)))
tasklet_kill(&engine->irq_tasklet);
dev_priv = engine->dev->dev_private;
if (engine->buffer) {
......@@ -2089,6 +2094,9 @@ logical_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->execlist_retired_req_list);
spin_lock_init(&engine->execlist_lock);
tasklet_init(&engine->irq_tasklet,
intel_lrc_irq_handler, (unsigned long)engine);
logical_ring_init_platform_invariants(engine);
ret = i915_cmd_parser_init_ring(engine);
......
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
浏览文件 @ 27af5eea
......@@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ int intel_execlists_submission(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params,
struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
struct list_head *vmas);
void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
void intel_execlists_retire_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
#endif /* _INTEL_LRC_H_ */
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
浏览文件 @ 27af5eea
......@@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
} semaphore;
/* Execlists */
spinlock_t execlist_lock;
struct tasklet_struct irq_tasklet;
spinlock_t execlist_lock; /* used inside tasklet, use spin_lock_bh */
struct list_head execlist_queue;
struct list_head execlist_retired_req_list;
unsigned int next_context_status_buffer;
......
Markdown is supported
0% 或 .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑！
想要评论请 注册 或