提交 24fbd6e0 编写于 作者: M Mark Rutland 提交者: Ingo Molnar

locking/atomics, media/dvb_ringbuffer: Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()

For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful.

However, for some features it is necessary to instrument reads and
writes separately, which is not possible with ACCESS_ONCE(). This
distinction is critical to correct operation.

It's possible to transform the bulk of kernel code using the Coccinelle
script below. However, this doesn't handle comments, leaving references
to ACCESS_ONCE() instances which have been removed. As a preparatory
step, this patch converts the DVB ringbuffer code and comments to use
{READ,WRITE}_ONCE() consistently.

----
virtual patch

@ depends on patch @
expression E1, E2;
@@

- ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
+ WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)

@ depends on patch @
expression E;
@@

- ACCESS_ONCE(E)
+ READ_ONCE(E)
----
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Cc: snitzer@redhat.com
Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508792849-3115-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 fd7048ad
...@@ -66,12 +66,12 @@ ssize_t dvb_ringbuffer_free(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf) ...@@ -66,12 +66,12 @@ ssize_t dvb_ringbuffer_free(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf)
{ {
ssize_t free; ssize_t free;
/* ACCESS_ONCE() to load read pointer on writer side /* READ_ONCE() to load read pointer on writer side
* this pairs with smp_store_release() in dvb_ringbuffer_read(), * this pairs with smp_store_release() in dvb_ringbuffer_read(),
* dvb_ringbuffer_read_user(), dvb_ringbuffer_flush(), * dvb_ringbuffer_read_user(), dvb_ringbuffer_flush(),
* or dvb_ringbuffer_reset() * or dvb_ringbuffer_reset()
*/ */
free = ACCESS_ONCE(rbuf->pread) - rbuf->pwrite; free = READ_ONCE(rbuf->pread) - rbuf->pwrite;
if (free <= 0) if (free <= 0)
free += rbuf->size; free += rbuf->size;
return free-1; return free-1;
...@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ ssize_t dvb_ringbuffer_read_user(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf, u8 __user *buf, si ...@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ ssize_t dvb_ringbuffer_read_user(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf, u8 __user *buf, si
todo -= split; todo -= split;
/* smp_store_release() for read pointer update to ensure /* smp_store_release() for read pointer update to ensure
* that buf is not overwritten until read is complete, * that buf is not overwritten until read is complete,
* this pairs with ACCESS_ONCE() in dvb_ringbuffer_free() * this pairs with READ_ONCE() in dvb_ringbuffer_free()
*/ */
smp_store_release(&rbuf->pread, 0); smp_store_release(&rbuf->pread, 0);
} }
...@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void dvb_ringbuffer_read(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf, u8 *buf, size_t len) ...@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void dvb_ringbuffer_read(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf, u8 *buf, size_t len)
todo -= split; todo -= split;
/* smp_store_release() for read pointer update to ensure /* smp_store_release() for read pointer update to ensure
* that buf is not overwritten until read is complete, * that buf is not overwritten until read is complete,
* this pairs with ACCESS_ONCE() in dvb_ringbuffer_free() * this pairs with READ_ONCE() in dvb_ringbuffer_free()
*/ */
smp_store_release(&rbuf->pread, 0); smp_store_release(&rbuf->pread, 0);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册