提交 22824fac 编写于 作者: V Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()

intel_digital_port_connected() lacks one 'else'. There's no
actual harm in not having it since each branch has an unconditional
return, so it can't accidentally end up in taking two branches instead
of just the one. But let's be consistent and add the 'else' anyway.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455201868-31527-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
上级 0780cd36
......@@ -4561,7 +4561,7 @@ bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
{
if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv))
return ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
return cpt_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
return bxt_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册