提交 205516c1 编写于 作者: K Ken Chen 提交者: Ingo Molnar

x86: convert rdtscll() to use __native_read_tsc

Impact: micro-optimization

Is there any reason why x86 rdtscll have to use the out of line
function instead of inline __native_read_tsc()?  native_read_tsc and
__native_read_tsc is essentially the same functions.

Patch to let x86 rdtscll() to use the inline version of read_tsc.
Signed-off-by: NKen Chen <kenchen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 5279585f
......@@ -181,10 +181,10 @@ static inline int rdmsrl_amd_safe(unsigned msr, unsigned long long *p)
}
#define rdtscl(low) \
((low) = (u32)native_read_tsc())
((low) = (u32)__native_read_tsc())
#define rdtscll(val) \
((val) = native_read_tsc())
((val) = __native_read_tsc())
#define rdpmc(counter, low, high) \
do { \
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册