提交 1e3335de 编写于 作者: J Jens Axboe 提交者: Jens Axboe

cfq-iosched: improve preemption for cooperating tasks

When testing the syslet async io approach, I discovered that CFQ
sometimes didn't perform as well as expected. cfq_should_preempt()
needs to better check for cooperating tasks, so fix that by allowing
preemption of an equal priority queue if the recently queued request
is as good a candidate for IO as the one we are currently waiting for.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
上级 b9099ff6
...@@ -867,15 +867,11 @@ static int cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd) ...@@ -867,15 +867,11 @@ static int cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
static void cfq_dispatch_insert(request_queue_t *q, struct request *rq) static void cfq_dispatch_insert(request_queue_t *q, struct request *rq)
{ {
struct cfq_data *cfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
struct cfq_queue *cfqq = RQ_CFQQ(rq); struct cfq_queue *cfqq = RQ_CFQQ(rq);
cfq_remove_request(rq); cfq_remove_request(rq);
cfqq->on_dispatch[rq_is_sync(rq)]++; cfqq->on_dispatch[rq_is_sync(rq)]++;
elv_dispatch_sort(q, rq); elv_dispatch_sort(q, rq);
rq = list_entry(q->queue_head.prev, struct request, queuelist);
cfqd->last_sector = rq->sector + rq->nr_sectors;
} }
/* /*
...@@ -1585,6 +1581,7 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq, ...@@ -1585,6 +1581,7 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
struct request *rq) struct request *rq)
{ {
struct cfq_queue *cfqq = cfqd->active_queue; struct cfq_queue *cfqq = cfqd->active_queue;
sector_t dist;
if (cfq_class_idle(new_cfqq)) if (cfq_class_idle(new_cfqq))
return 0; return 0;
...@@ -1594,14 +1591,14 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq, ...@@ -1594,14 +1591,14 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
if (cfq_class_idle(cfqq)) if (cfq_class_idle(cfqq))
return 1; return 1;
if (!cfq_cfqq_wait_request(new_cfqq))
return 0;
/* /*
* if the new request is sync, but the currently running queue is * if the new request is sync, but the currently running queue is
* not, let the sync request have priority. * not, let the sync request have priority.
*/ */
if (rq_is_sync(rq) && !cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq)) if (rq_is_sync(rq) && !cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq))
return 1; return 1;
/* /*
* So both queues are sync. Let the new request get disk time if * So both queues are sync. Let the new request get disk time if
* it's a metadata request and the current queue is doing regular IO. * it's a metadata request and the current queue is doing regular IO.
...@@ -1609,6 +1606,21 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq, ...@@ -1609,6 +1606,21 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
if (rq_is_meta(rq) && !cfqq->meta_pending) if (rq_is_meta(rq) && !cfqq->meta_pending)
return 1; return 1;
if (!cfqd->active_cic || !cfq_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq))
return 0;
/*
* if this request is as-good as one we would expect from the
* current cfqq, let it preempt
*/
if (rq->sector > cfqd->last_sector)
dist = rq->sector - cfqd->last_sector;
else
dist = cfqd->last_sector - rq->sector;
if (dist <= cfqd->active_cic->seek_mean)
return 1;
return 0; return 0;
} }
...@@ -1719,6 +1731,8 @@ static void cfq_completed_request(request_queue_t *q, struct request *rq) ...@@ -1719,6 +1731,8 @@ static void cfq_completed_request(request_queue_t *q, struct request *rq)
cfqq->on_dispatch[sync]--; cfqq->on_dispatch[sync]--;
cfqq->service_last = now; cfqq->service_last = now;
cfqd->last_sector = rq->hard_sector + rq->hard_nr_sectors;
if (!cfq_class_idle(cfqq)) if (!cfq_class_idle(cfqq))
cfqd->last_end_request = now; cfqd->last_end_request = now;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册