提交 1ab5c056 编写于 作者: A Andrey Ryabinin 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm/memcontrol.c: try harder to decrease [memory,memsw].limit_in_bytes

mem_cgroup_resize_[memsw]_limit() tries to free only 32
(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) pages on each iteration.  This makes it practically
impossible to decrease limit of memory cgroup.  Tasks could easily
allocate back 32 pages, so we can't reduce memory usage, and once
retry_count reaches zero we return -EBUSY.

Easy to reproduce the problem by running the following commands:

  mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test
  echo $$ >> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/tasks
  cat big_file > /dev/null &
  sleep 1 && echo $((100*1024*1024)) > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
  -bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy

Instead of relying on retry_count, keep retrying the reclaim until the
desired limit is reached or fail if the reclaim doesn't make any
progress or a signal is pending.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180119132544.19569-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.comSigned-off-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 8ad6e404
...@@ -1176,20 +1176,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p) ...@@ -1176,20 +1176,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
} }
} }
/*
* This function returns the number of memcg under hierarchy tree. Returns
* 1(self count) if no children.
*/
static int mem_cgroup_count_children(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
int num = 0;
struct mem_cgroup *iter;
for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg)
num++;
return num;
}
/* /*
* Return the memory (and swap, if configured) limit for a memcg. * Return the memory (and swap, if configured) limit for a memcg.
*/ */
...@@ -2463,24 +2449,11 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_limit_mutex); ...@@ -2463,24 +2449,11 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_limit_mutex);
static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unsigned long limit, bool memsw) unsigned long limit, bool memsw)
{ {
unsigned long curusage;
unsigned long oldusage;
bool enlarge = false; bool enlarge = false;
int retry_count;
int ret; int ret;
bool limits_invariant; bool limits_invariant;
struct page_counter *counter = memsw ? &memcg->memsw : &memcg->memory; struct page_counter *counter = memsw ? &memcg->memsw : &memcg->memory;
/*
* For keeping hierarchical_reclaim simple, how long we should retry
* is depends on callers. We set our retry-count to be function
* of # of children which we should visit in this loop.
*/
retry_count = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES *
mem_cgroup_count_children(memcg);
oldusage = page_counter_read(counter);
do { do {
if (signal_pending(current)) { if (signal_pending(current)) {
ret = -EINTR; ret = -EINTR;
...@@ -2507,15 +2480,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, ...@@ -2507,15 +2480,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (!ret) if (!ret)
break; break;
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL, !memsw); if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1,
GFP_KERNEL, !memsw)) {
curusage = page_counter_read(counter); ret = -EBUSY;
/* Usage is reduced ? */ break;
if (curusage >= oldusage) }
retry_count--; } while (true);
else
oldusage = curusage;
} while (retry_count);
if (!ret && enlarge) if (!ret && enlarge)
memcg_oom_recover(memcg); memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册