提交 1827d1c4 编写于 作者: G Georgy A Bystrenin 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

CIFS: Fix error mapping for SMB2_LOCK command which caused OFD lock problem

commit 9a596f5b39593414c0ec80f71b94a226286f084e upstream.

While resolving a bug with locks on samba shares found a strange behavior.
When a file locked by one node and we trying to lock it from another node
it fail with errno 5 (EIO) but in that case errno must be set to
(EACCES | EAGAIN).
This isn't happening when we try to lock file second time on same node.
In this case it returns EACCES as expected.
Also this issue not reproduces when we use SMB1 protocol (vers=1.0 in
mount options).

Further investigation showed that the mapping from status_to_posix_error
is different for SMB1 and SMB2+ implementations.
For SMB1 mapping is [NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED to ERRlock]
(See fs/cifs/netmisc.c line 66)
but for SMB2+ mapping is [STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED to -EIO]
(see fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c line 383)

Quick changes in SMB2+ mapping from EIO to EACCES has fixed issue.

BUG: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201971Signed-off-by: NGeorgy A Bystrenin <gkot@altlinux.org>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
CC: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
上级 db825a79
......@@ -379,8 +379,8 @@ static const struct status_to_posix_error smb2_error_map_table[] = {
{STATUS_NONEXISTENT_EA_ENTRY, -EIO, "STATUS_NONEXISTENT_EA_ENTRY"},
{STATUS_NO_EAS_ON_FILE, -ENODATA, "STATUS_NO_EAS_ON_FILE"},
{STATUS_EA_CORRUPT_ERROR, -EIO, "STATUS_EA_CORRUPT_ERROR"},
{STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT, -EIO, "STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT"},
{STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED, -EIO, "STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED"},
{STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT, -EACCES, "STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT"},
{STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED, -EACCES, "STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED"},
{STATUS_DELETE_PENDING, -ENOENT, "STATUS_DELETE_PENDING"},
{STATUS_CTL_FILE_NOT_SUPPORTED, -ENOSYS,
"STATUS_CTL_FILE_NOT_SUPPORTED"},
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册