提交 177996e6 编写于 作者: B Benjamin Herrenschmidt

powerpc: Don't do generic calibrate_delay()

Currently we are wasting time calling the generic calibrate_delay()
function. We don't need it since our implementation of __delay() is
based on the CPU timebase. So instead, we use our own small
implementation that initializes loops_per_jiffy to something sensible
to make the few users like spinlock debug be happy
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
上级 529273c1
......@@ -93,10 +93,6 @@ config GENERIC_HWEIGHT
bool
default y
config GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY
bool
default y
config GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT
bool
default y
......
......@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/posix-timers.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
......@@ -1143,6 +1144,15 @@ void div128_by_32(u64 dividend_high, u64 dividend_low,
}
/* We don't need to calibrate delay, we use the CPU timebase for that */
void calibrate_delay(void)
{
/* Some generic code (such as spinlock debug) use loops_per_jiffy
* as the number of __delay(1) in a jiffy, so make it so
*/
loops_per_jiffy = tb_ticks_per_jiffy;
}
static int __init rtc_init(void)
{
struct platform_device *pdev;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册