net_sched: carefully handle tcf_block_put()
As pointed out by Jiri, there is still a race condition between tcf_block_put() and tcf_chain_destroy() in a RCU callback. There is no way to make it correct without proper locking or synchronization, because both operate on a shared list. Locking is hard, because the only lock we can pick here is a spinlock, however, in tc_dump_tfilter() we iterate this list with a sleeping function called (tcf_chain_dump()), which makes using a lock to protect chain_list almost impossible. Jiri suggested the idea of holding a refcnt before flushing, this works because it guarantees us there would be no parallel tcf_chain_destroy() during the loop, therefore the race condition is gone. But we have to be very careful with proper synchronization with RCU callbacks. Suggested-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录