提交 1535bd8a 编写于 作者: D Dave Kleikamp 提交者: David S. Miller

sparc64: don't treat 64-bit syscall return codes as 32-bit

When checking a system call return code for an error,
linux_sparc_syscall was sign-extending the lower 32-bit value and
comparing it to -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK. lseek can return valid return
codes whose lower 32-bits alone would indicate a failure (such as 4G-1).
Use the whole 64-bit value to check for errors. Only the 32-bit path
should sign extend the lower 32-bit value.
Signed-off-by: NDave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NAllen Pais <allen.pais@oracle.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 e58e241c
......@@ -189,7 +189,8 @@ linux_sparc_syscall32:
mov %i0, %l5 ! IEU1
5: call %l7 ! CTI Group brk forced
srl %i5, 0, %o5 ! IEU1
ba,a,pt %xcc, 3f
ba,pt %xcc, 3f
sra %o0, 0, %o0
/* Linux native system calls enter here... */
.align 32
......@@ -217,7 +218,6 @@ linux_sparc_syscall:
3: stx %o0, [%sp + PTREGS_OFF + PT_V9_I0]
ret_sys_call:
ldx [%sp + PTREGS_OFF + PT_V9_TSTATE], %g3
sra %o0, 0, %o0
mov %ulo(TSTATE_XCARRY | TSTATE_ICARRY), %g2
sllx %g2, 32, %g2
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册