提交 13c84951 编写于 作者: G Guenter Roeck 提交者: Jean Delvare

hwmon: (lm90) Add explicit support for max6659

Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: NJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
上级 96512861
......@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ Supported chips:
Datasheet: Publicly available at the Maxim website
http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/2578
* Maxim MAX6659
Prefix: 'max6657'
Addresses scanned: I2C 0x4c, 0x4d (unsupported 0x4e)
Prefix: 'max6659'
Addresses scanned: I2C 0x4c, 0x4d, 0x4e
Datasheet: Publicly available at the Maxim website
http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/2578
* Maxim MAX6680
......
......@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
* and MAX6658 have address 0x4c.
* ADM1032-2, ADT7461-2, LM89-1, LM99-1 and MAX6646 have address 0x4d.
* MAX6647 has address 0x4e.
* MAX6659 can have address 0x4c, 0x4d or 0x4e (unsupported).
* MAX6659 can have address 0x4c, 0x4d or 0x4e.
* MAX6680 and MAX6681 can have address 0x18, 0x19, 0x1a, 0x29, 0x2a, 0x2b,
* 0x4c, 0x4d or 0x4e.
*/
......@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@
static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = {
0x18, 0x19, 0x1a, 0x29, 0x2a, 0x2b, 0x4c, 0x4d, 0x4e, I2C_CLIENT_END };
enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, adt7461, max6680, max6646,
w83l771 };
enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
max6646, w83l771 };
/*
* The LM90 registers
......@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm90_id[] = {
{ "max6649", max6646 },
{ "max6657", max6657 },
{ "max6658", max6657 },
{ "max6659", max6657 },
{ "max6659", max6659 },
{ "max6680", max6680 },
{ "max6681", max6680 },
{ "w83l771", w83l771 },
......@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ struct lm90_data {
s16 temp11[5]; /* 0: remote input
1: remote low limit
2: remote high limit
3: remote offset (except max6646 and max6657)
3: remote offset (except max6646 and max6657/58/59)
4: local input */
u8 temp_hyst;
u8 alarms; /* bitvector */
......@@ -766,12 +766,20 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client,
* register. Likewise, the config1 register seems to lack a
* low nibble, so the value will be those of the previous
* read, so in our case those of the man_id register.
* MAX6659 has a third set of upper temperature limit registers.
* Those registers also return values on MAX6657 and MAX6658,
* thus the only way to detect MAX6659 is by its address.
* For this reason it will be mis-detected as MAX6657 if its
* address is 0x4C.
*/
if (chip_id == man_id
&& (address == 0x4C || address == 0x4D)
&& (address == 0x4C || address == 0x4D || address == 0x4E)
&& (reg_config1 & 0x1F) == (man_id & 0x0F)
&& reg_convrate <= 0x09) {
name = "max6657";
if (address == 0x4C)
name = "max6657";
else
name = "max6659";
} else
/*
* The chip_id register of the MAX6680 and MAX6681 holds the
......@@ -861,14 +869,16 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *new_client,
}
/* Set chip capabilities */
if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6646)
if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6659
&& data->kind != max6646)
data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_OFFSET;
if (data->kind == max6657 || data->kind == max6646)
if (data->kind == max6657 || data->kind == max6659
|| data->kind == max6646)
data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_LOCAL_EXT;
if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6646
&& data->kind != max6680)
if (data->kind != max6657 && data->kind != max6659
&& data->kind != max6646 && data->kind != max6680)
data->flags |= LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT;
/* Initialize the LM90 chip */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册