提交 12be846d 编写于 作者: A Anjali Singhai Jain 提交者: Jeff Kirsher

i40e: Avoid adding the TCP-IPv4 filter twice

There wasn't a need to play the logic twice, it seems
like a left over from when we had to add two PTYPEs for
one filter. There should be no change in the number of
filters that actually got added to the hardware.

Change-ID: I5071d02eafd020b60e30eb96219f110f334eec85
Signed-off-by: NAnjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
上级 fbd5e2df
......@@ -271,19 +271,6 @@ static int i40e_add_del_fdir_tcpv4(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
fd_data->pctype, ret);
}
fd_data->pctype = I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_NONF_IPV4_TCP;
ret = i40e_program_fdir_filter(fd_data, raw_packet, pf, add);
if (ret) {
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
"Filter command send failed for PCTYPE %d (ret = %d)\n",
fd_data->pctype, ret);
err = true;
} else {
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "Filter OK for PCTYPE %d (ret = %d)\n",
fd_data->pctype, ret);
}
return err ? -EOPNOTSUPP : 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册