提交 11e584cf 编写于 作者: V Viresh Kumar 提交者: Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive policies from sysfs

Later commits would change the way policies are managed today. Policies
wouldn't be freed on cpu hotplug (currently they aren't freed only for
suspend), and while the CPU is offline, the sysfs cpufreq files would
still be present.

User may accidentally try to update the sysfs files in following
directory: '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/'. And that would
result in undefined behavior as policy wouldn't be active then.

Apart from updating the store() routine, we also update __cpufreq_get()
which can call cpufreq_out_of_sync(). The later routine tries to update
policy->cur and starts notifying kernel about it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
上级 6c1e4591
......@@ -875,11 +875,18 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
/* Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. */
if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy))) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto unlock_policy_rwsem;
}
if (fattr->store)
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
else
ret = -EIO;
unlock_policy_rwsem:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
......@@ -1610,6 +1617,10 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
ret_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
/* Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. */
if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy)))
return ret_freq;
if (ret_freq && policy->cur &&
!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS)) {
/* verify no discrepancy between actual and
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册