提交 0e64e94e 编写于 作者: G Gerrit Renker 提交者: David S. Miller

[DCCP]: Update documentation references.

Updates the references to spec documents throughout the code, taking into
account that

* the DCCP, CCID 2, and CCID 3 drafts all became RFCs in March this year

* RFC 1063 was obsoleted by RFC 1191

* draft-ietf-tcpimpl-pmtud-0x.txt was published as an Informational
  RFC, RFC 2923 on 2000-09-22.

All references verified.
Signed-off-by: NGerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 977a415f
......@@ -4,15 +4,15 @@ menu "DCCP Configuration (EXPERIMENTAL)"
config IP_DCCP
tristate "The DCCP Protocol (EXPERIMENTAL)"
---help---
Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (RFC 4340)
From draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11 <http://www.icir.org/kohler/dcp/draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11.txt>.
From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4340.txt:
The Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) is a transport
protocol that implements bidirectional, unicast connections of
congestion-controlled, unreliable datagrams. It should be suitable
for use by applications such as streaming media, Internet telephony,
and on-line games
and on-line games.
To compile this protocol support as a module, choose M here: the
module will be called dccp.
......
......@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ int dccp_insert_option_ackvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
memcpy(to, from, len);
/*
* From draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11.txt:
* From RFC 4340, A.2:
*
* For each acknowledgement it sends, the HC-Receiver will add an
* acknowledgement record. ack_seqno will equal the HC-Receiver
......@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static inline int dccp_ackvec_set_buf_head_state(struct dccp_ackvec *av,
}
/*
* Implements the draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11.txt Appendix A
* Implements the RFC 4340, Appendix A
*/
int dccp_ackvec_add(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const struct sock *sk,
const u64 ackno, const u8 state)
......@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ int dccp_ackvec_add(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const struct sock *sk,
* We may well decide to do buffer compression, etc, but for now lets
* just drop.
*
* From Appendix A:
* From Appendix A.1.1 (`New Packets'):
*
* Of course, the circular buffer may overflow, either when the
* HC-Sender is sending data at a very high rate, when the
......@@ -274,9 +274,9 @@ int dccp_ackvec_add(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const struct sock *sk,
/*
* A.1.2. Old Packets
*
* When a packet with Sequence Number S arrives, and
* S <= buf_ackno, the HC-Receiver will scan the table
* for the byte corresponding to S. (Indexing structures
* When a packet with Sequence Number S <= buf_ackno
* arrives, the HC-Receiver will scan the table for
* the byte corresponding to S. (Indexing structures
* could reduce the complexity of this scan.)
*/
u64 delta = dccp_delta_seqno(ackno, av->dccpav_buf_ackno);
......
......@@ -28,8 +28,7 @@
/** struct dccp_ackvec - ack vector
*
* This data structure is the one defined in the DCCP draft
* Appendix A.
* This data structure is the one defined in RFC 4340, Appendix A.
*
* @dccpav_buf_head - circular buffer head
* @dccpav_buf_tail - circular buffer tail
......
......@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ config IP_DCCP_CCID2
for lost packets, would prefer CCID 2 to CCID 3. On-line games may
also prefer CCID 2.
CCID 2 is further described in:
http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid2-10.txt
CCID 2 is further described in RFC 4341,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4341.txt
This text was extracted from:
http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt
This text was extracted from RFC 4340 (sec. 10.1),
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4340.txt
If in doubt, say M.
......@@ -53,15 +53,14 @@ config IP_DCCP_CCID3
suitable than CCID 2 for applications such streaming media where a
relatively smooth sending rate is of importance.
CCID 3 is further described in:
http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid3-11.txt.
CCID 3 is further described in RFC 4342,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4342.txt
The TFRC congestion control algorithms were initially described in
RFC 3448.
This text was extracted from:
http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt
This text was extracted from RFC 4340 (sec. 10.2),
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4340.txt
If in doubt, say M.
......
......@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
*/
/*
* This implementation should follow: draft-ietf-dccp-ccid2-10.txt
* This implementation should follow RFC 4341
*
* BUGS:
* - sequence number wrapping
......
......@@ -379,8 +379,7 @@ static void ccid3_hc_tx_packet_sent(struct sock *sk, int more, int len)
packet->dccphtx_seqno = dp->dccps_gss;
/*
* Check if win_count have changed
* Algorithm in "8.1. Window Counter Valuer" in
* draft-ietf-dccp-ccid3-11.txt
* Algorithm in "8.1. Window Counter Value" in RFC 4342.
*/
quarter_rtt = timeval_delta(&now, &hctx->ccid3hctx_t_last_win_count);
if (likely(hctx->ccid3hctx_rtt > 8))
......
......@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ extern void dccp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo);
#define DCCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN (60 * HZ) /* how long to wait to destroy TIME-WAIT
* state, about 60 seconds */
/* draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11.txt initial RTO value */
/* RFC 1122, 4.2.3.1 initial RTO value */
#define DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT ((unsigned)(3 * HZ))
/* Maximal interval between probes for local resources. */
......
......@@ -216,11 +216,11 @@ static int __dccp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
dccp_send_sync(sk, DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq,
DCCP_PKT_SYNCACK);
/*
* From the draft:
* From RFC 4340, sec. 5.7
*
* As with DCCP-Ack packets, DCCP-Sync and DCCP-SyncAck packets
* MAY have non-zero-length application data areas, whose
* contents * receivers MUST ignore.
* contents receivers MUST ignore.
*/
goto discard;
}
......
......@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline void dccp_do_pmtu_discovery(struct sock *sk,
dccp_sync_mss(sk, mtu);
/*
* From: draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11.txt
* From RFC 4340, sec. 14.1:
*
* DCCP-Sync packets are the best choice for upward
* probing, since DCCP-Sync probes do not risk application
......@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static void dccp_v4_ctl_send_reset(struct sk_buff *rxskb)
dccp_hdr_reset(skb)->dccph_reset_code =
DCCP_SKB_CB(rxskb)->dccpd_reset_code;
/* See "8.3.1. Abnormal Termination" in draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11 */
/* See "8.3.1. Abnormal Termination" in RFC 4340 */
seqno = 0;
if (DCCP_SKB_CB(rxskb)->dccpd_ack_seq != DCCP_PKT_WITHOUT_ACK_SEQ)
dccp_set_seqno(&seqno, DCCP_SKB_CB(rxskb)->dccpd_ack_seq + 1);
......
......@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static void dccp_v6_ctl_send_reset(struct sk_buff *rxskb)
dccp_hdr_reset(skb)->dccph_reset_code =
DCCP_SKB_CB(rxskb)->dccpd_reset_code;
/* See "8.3.1. Abnormal Termination" in draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11 */
/* See "8.3.1. Abnormal Termination" in RFC 4340 */
seqno = 0;
if (DCCP_SKB_CB(rxskb)->dccpd_ack_seq != DCCP_PKT_WITHOUT_ACK_SEQ)
dccp_set_seqno(&seqno, DCCP_SKB_CB(rxskb)->dccpd_ack_seq + 1);
......
......@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
elapsed_time);
break;
/*
* From draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11.txt:
* From RFC 4340, sec. 10.3:
*
* Option numbers 128 through 191 are for
* options sent from the HC-Sender to the
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册