提交 0a43d5d4 编写于 作者: N Nigel Croxon 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

raid5: don't increment read_errors on EILSEQ return

[ Upstream commit b76b4715eba0d0ed574f58918b29c1b2f0fa37a8 ]

While MD continues to count read errors returned by the lower layer.
If those errors are -EILSEQ, instead of -EIO, it should NOT increase
the read_errors count.

When RAID6 is set up on dm-integrity target that detects massive
corruption, the leg will be ejected from the array.  Even if the
issue is correctable with a sector re-write and the array has
necessary redundancy to correct it.

The leg is ejected because it runs up the rdev->read_errors beyond
conf->max_nr_stripes.  The return status in dm-drypt when there is
a data integrity error is -EILSEQ (BLK_STS_PROTECTION).
Signed-off-by: NNigel Croxon <ncroxon@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
上级 da87dfca
......@@ -2540,7 +2540,8 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi)
int set_bad = 0;
clear_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh->dev[i].flags);
atomic_inc(&rdev->read_errors);
if (!(bi->bi_status == BLK_STS_PROTECTION))
atomic_inc(&rdev->read_errors);
if (test_bit(R5_ReadRepl, &sh->dev[i].flags))
pr_warn_ratelimited(
"md/raid:%s: read error on replacement device (sector %llu on %s).\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册