bpf: Use correct #ifdef controller for trace_call_bpf()
Commit e1abf2cc ("bpf: Fix the build on BPF_SYSCALL=y && !CONFIG_TRACING kernels, make it more configurable") updated the building condition of bpf_trace.o from CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL to CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS, but the corresponding #ifdef controller in trace_events.h for trace_call_bpf() was not changed. Which, in theory, is incorrect. With current Kconfigs, we can create a .config with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y and CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS=n by unselecting CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT and selecting CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. With these options, trace_call_bpf() will be defined as an extern function, but if anyone calls it a symbol missing error will be triggered since bpf_trace.o was not built. This patch changes the #ifdef controller for trace_call_bpf() from CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL to CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS. I'll show its correctness: Before this patch: BPF_SYSCALL BPF_EVENTS trace_call_bpf bpf_trace.o y y normal compiled n n inline not compiled y n normal not compiled (incorrect) n y impossible (BPF_EVENTS depends on BPF_SYSCALL) After this patch: BPF_SYSCALL BPF_EVENTS trace_call_bpf bpf_trace.o y y normal compiled n n inline not compiled y n inline not compiled (fixed) n y impossible (BPF_EVENTS depends on BPF_SYSCALL) So this patch doesn't break anything. QED. Signed-off-by: NWang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> Cc: pi3orama@163.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435716878-189507-2-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录