drm/i915: Move vblank wait determination to 'check' phase
Determining whether we'll need to wait for vblanks is something we should determine during the atomic 'check' phase, not the 'commit' phase. Note that we only set these bits in the branch of 'check' where intel_crtc->active is true so that we don't try to wait on a disabled CRTC. The whole 'wait for vblank after update' flag should go away in the future, once we start handling watermarks in a proper atomic manner. This regression has been introduced in commit 2fdd7def16dd7580f297827930126c16b152ec11 Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Date: Wed Mar 4 10:49:04 2015 -0800 drm/i915: Don't clobber plane state on internal disables Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Root-cause-analysis-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89550 Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/legacy-planes Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/legacy-planes-dpms Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/universal-planes Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/universal-planes-dpms Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录