提交 08ec9af1 编写于 作者: D David S. Miller

xfrm: Fix xfrm_state_find() wrt. wildcard source address.

The change to make xfrm_state objects hash on source address
broke the case where such source addresses are wildcarded.

Fix this by doing a two phase lookup, first with fully specified
source address, next using saddr wildcarded.
Reported-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@dev.6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 9616a755
......@@ -748,12 +748,51 @@ static void xfrm_hash_grow_check(struct net *net, int have_hash_collision)
schedule_work(&net->xfrm.state_hash_work);
}
static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x,
struct flowi *fl, unsigned short family,
xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr,
struct xfrm_state **best, int *acq_in_progress,
int *error)
{
/* Resolution logic:
* 1. There is a valid state with matching selector. Done.
* 2. Valid state with inappropriate selector. Skip.
*
* Entering area of "sysdeps".
*
* 3. If state is not valid, selector is temporary, it selects
* only session which triggered previous resolution. Key
* manager will do something to install a state with proper
* selector.
*/
if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_VALID) {
if ((x->sel.family &&
!xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family)) ||
!security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
return;
if (!*best ||
(*best)->km.dying > x->km.dying ||
((*best)->km.dying == x->km.dying &&
(*best)->curlft.add_time < x->curlft.add_time))
*best = x;
} else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ACQ) {
*acq_in_progress = 1;
} else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR ||
x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_EXPIRED) {
if (xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family) &&
security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
*error = -ESRCH;
}
}
struct xfrm_state *
xfrm_state_find(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr,
struct flowi *fl, struct xfrm_tmpl *tmpl,
struct xfrm_policy *pol, int *err,
unsigned short family)
{
static xfrm_address_t saddr_wildcard = { };
struct net *net = xp_net(pol);
unsigned int h;
struct hlist_node *entry;
......@@ -773,40 +812,27 @@ xfrm_state_find(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr,
xfrm_state_addr_check(x, daddr, saddr, family) &&
tmpl->mode == x->props.mode &&
tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
(tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi)) {
/* Resolution logic:
1. There is a valid state with matching selector.
Done.
2. Valid state with inappropriate selector. Skip.
Entering area of "sysdeps".
3. If state is not valid, selector is temporary,
it selects only session which triggered
previous resolution. Key manager will do
something to install a state with proper
selector.
*/
if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_VALID) {
if ((x->sel.family && !xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family)) ||
!security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
continue;
if (!best ||
best->km.dying > x->km.dying ||
(best->km.dying == x->km.dying &&
best->curlft.add_time < x->curlft.add_time))
best = x;
} else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ACQ) {
acquire_in_progress = 1;
} else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR ||
x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_EXPIRED) {
if (xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family) &&
security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
error = -ESRCH;
}
}
(tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family, daddr, saddr,
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
}
if (best)
goto found;
h = xfrm_dst_hash(net, daddr, &saddr_wildcard, tmpl->reqid, family);
hlist_for_each_entry(x, entry, net->xfrm.state_bydst+h, bydst) {
if (x->props.family == family &&
x->props.reqid == tmpl->reqid &&
!(x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_WILDRECV) &&
xfrm_state_addr_check(x, daddr, saddr, family) &&
tmpl->mode == x->props.mode &&
tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
(tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family, daddr, saddr,
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
}
found:
x = best;
if (!x && !error && !acquire_in_progress) {
if (tmpl->id.spi &&
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册