io-wq: optimise out *next_work() double lock

to #28170604

commit f462fd36fc43662eeb42c95a9b8da8659af6d75e upstream

When executing non-linked hashed work, io_worker_handle_work()
will lock-unlock wqe->lock to update hash, and then immediately
lock-unlock to get next work. Optimise this case and do
lock/unlock only once.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Acked-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

fs/io-wq.c

@@ -475,11 +475,11 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
 {
 	struct io_wqe *wqe = worker->wqe;
 	struct io_wq *wq = wqe->wq;
+	unsigned hash = -1U;
 
 	do {
 		struct io_wq_work *work;
-		unsigned hash = -1U;
-
+get_next:
 		/*
 		 * If we got some work, mark us as busy. If we didn't, but
 		 * the list isn't empty, it means we stalled on hashed work.
@@ -525,9 +525,12 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
 				spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
 				wqe->hash_map &= ~BIT_ULL(hash);
 				wqe->flags &= ~IO_WQE_FLAG_STALLED;
-				spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
 				/* dependent work is not hashed */
 				hash = -1U;
+				/* skip unnecessary unlock-lock wqe->lock */
+				if (!work)
+					goto get_next;
+				spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
 			}
 		} while (work);