-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
The X86_BUG_F00F work around is responsible for fixing up the error generated on attempted F00F exploitation from an OOPS to a SIGILL. There is no reason why this code should not be allowed to run on PV guest on a F00F-affected CPU -- it would simply never trigger. The pv_enabled() check was there only to avoid printing the f00f workaround, so removing the check is purely a cosmetic change. Suggested-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com Cc: ffainelli@freebox.fr Cc: george.dunlap@citrix.com Cc: glin@suse.com Cc: jgross@suse.com Cc: jlee@suse.com Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: julien.grall@linaro.org Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com Cc: kozerkov@parallels.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Cc: lguest@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: lv.zheng@intel.com Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Cc: mbizon@freebox.fr Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: robert.moore@intel.com Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au Cc: tiwai@suse.de Cc: toshi.kani@hp.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460592286-300-11-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
fa392794