-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
And then rename it to ironlake_irq_handler. Also move ilk_gt_irq_handler up to avoid forward declarations. In the previous patches I did small modifications to both ironlake_irq_handler an ivybridge_irq_handler so they became very similar functions. Now it should be very easy to verify that all we need to add ILK/SNB support is to call ilk_gt_irq_handler, call ilk_display_irq_handler and avoid reading pm_iir on gen 5. v2: - Rebase due to changes on the previous patches - Move pm_iir to a tighter scope (Chris) - Change some Gen checks for readability Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
f1af8fc1