Looks like the TSEG lives just above TOUD, stolen comes after TSEG.

The spec seems somewhat self-contradictory in places, in the ESMRAMC
register desctription it says:
 TSEG Size:
  10=(TOUD + 512 KB) to TOUD
  11 =(TOUD + 1 MB) to TOUD

so that agrees with TSEG being at TOUD. But the example given
elsehwere in the spec says:

 TOUD equals 62.5 MB = 03E7FFFFh
 TSEG selected as 512 KB in size,
 Graphics local memory selected as 1 MB in size
 General System RAM available in system = 62.5 MB
 General system RAM range00000000h to 03E7FFFFh
 TSEG address range03F80000h to 03FFFFFFh
 TSEG pre-allocated from03F80000h to 03FFFFFFh
 Graphics local memory pre-allocated from03E80000h to 03F7FFFFh

so here we have TSEG above stolen.

Real world evidence agrees with the TOUD->TSEG->stolen order however, so
let's fix up the code to account for the TSEG size.

Cc: Taketo Kabe <fdporg@vega.pgw.jp>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0ad98c74 ("drm/i915: Determine the stolen memory base address on gen2")
Fixes: a4dff769 ("x86/gpu: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms")
Reported-by: NTaketo Kabe <fdporg@vega.pgw.jp>
Tested-by: NTaketo Kabe <fdporg@vega.pgw.jp>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96473Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470653919-27251-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Link: http://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/25251405.pdfReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>