-
由 Brian Foster 提交于
xfs_bmap_del_extent() handles extent removal from the in-core and on-disk extent lists. When removing a delalloc range, it updates the indirect block reservation appropriately based on the removal. It currently enforces that the new indirect block reservation is less than or equal to the original. This is normally the case in all situations except for in certain cases when the removed range creates a hole in a single delalloc extent, thus splitting a single delalloc extent in two. It is possible with small enough extents to split an indlen==1 extent into two such slightly smaller extents. This leaves one extent with 0 indirect blocks and leads to assert failures in other areas (e.g., xfs_bunmapi() if the extent happens to be removed). Update the indlen distribution code to steal blocks from the deleted extent, if necessary, to satisfy the worst case total indirect reservation for the new extents. This is safe as the caller does not update the fdblocks counters until the extent is removed. Blocks stolen in this manner simply remain accounted as allocated, having ownership transferred from the data extent to an indirect reservation. As a precaution, fall back to the original reservation algorithm if the new indlen requirement is not met and warn if we end up with extents without any reservation at all to detect this more easily in the future. Signed-off-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
d34999c9