1) Ignoring return value from iov_iter_zero() is wrong
for iovec-backed case as well as for pipes - it can fail.

2) Failure to fault destination pages in 25Mb into a 50Mb iovec
should not act as if nothing in the area had been read, nevermind
that the first 25Mb might have *already* been read by that point.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>