-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:45:16AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > The reason I coded this up was that NMIs were firing off so fast that > nothing else was getting a chance to run. With this patch, at least the > printk() would come out and I'd have some idea what was going on. It will start spewing to early_printk() (which is a lot nicer to use from NMI context too) when it fails to queue the IRQ-work because its already enqueued. It does have the false-positive for when two CPUs trigger the warn concurrently, but that should be rare and some extra clutter on the early printk shouldn't be a problem. Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: dzickus@redhat.com Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Fixes: 6a02ad66 ("perf/x86: Push the duration-logging printk() to IRQ context") Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140211150116.GO27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
cd578abb