• P
    fs/ramfs: don't use module_init for non-modular core code · af52b040
    Paul Gortmaker 提交于
    The ramfs is always built in.  It will never be modular, so using
    module_init as an alias for __initcall is rather misleading.
    
    Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from init.h into
    module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd have to add module.h
    to obviously non-modular code, and that would be a worse thing.
    
    Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs.  one of the
    priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets mapped onto
    device_initcall, our use of fs_initcall (which makes sense for fs code)
    will thus change this registration from level 6-device to level 5-fs
    (i.e. slightly earlier).  However no observable impact of that small
    difference has been observed during testing, or is expected.
    
    Also note that this change uncovers a missing semicolon bug in the
    registration of the initcall.
    Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
    Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    af52b040
inode.c 6.4 KB