-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
I've tried to split this up, but all the changes are so tightly related that I didn't find a good way to do this without breaking bisecting. Essentially this completely changes how psr is glued into the overall driver, and there's not much you can do to soften such a paradigm change. - Use frontbuffer tracking bits stuff to separate disable and re-enable. - Don't re-check everything in the psr work. We have now accurate tracking for everything, so no need to check for sprites or tiling really. Allows us to ditch tons of locks. - That in turn allows us to properly cancel the work in the disable function - no more deadlocks. - Add a check for HSW sprites and force a flush. Apparently the hardware doesn't forward the flushing when updating the sprite base address. We can do the same trick everywhere else we have such issues, e.g. on baytrail with ... everything. - Don't re-enable psr with a delay in psr_exit. It really must be turned off forever if we detect a gtt write. At least with the current frontbuffer render tracking. Userspace can do a busy ioctl call or no-op pageflip to re-enable psr. - Drop redundant checks for crtc and crtc->active - now that they're only called from enable this is guaranteed. - Fix up the hsw port check. eDP can also happen on port D, but the issue is exactly that it doesn't work there. So an || check is wrong. - We still schedule the psr work with a delay. The frontbuffer flushing interface mandates that we upload the next full frame, so need to wait a bit. Once we have single-shot frame uploads we can do better here. v2: Don't enable psr initially, rely upon the fb flush of the initial plane setup for that. Gives us more unified code flow and makes the crtc enable sequence less a special case. v3: s/psr_exit/psr_invalidate/ for consistency v4: Fixup whitespace. v5: Correctly bail out of psr_invalidate/flush when dev_priv->psr.enabled is NULL. Spotted by Rodrigo. v6: - Only schedule work when there's work to do. Fixes WARNINGs reported by Rodrigo. - Comments Chris requested to clarify the code. v7: Fix conflict on rebase (Rodrigo) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (v6) Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
9ca15301